• DOCX
• 5.2 MB
• Created: 18/3/2022

RFWP Rule 43 caption _Ref53651562 Table 1 : Resource Consents applied for and relevant regional plan rule _Toc98245831 Consent 1795-5.0: Take water from the Waiaua River numbered_Paras This is straightforward intake of water from behind the weir and is described in section 2 above. The expired consent specified a maximum take of 3900 L/s but there is no metering of the take rate so compliance with this condition has never been monitored. We assume that his limit is based on the

• PDF
• 1 MB
• Created: 11/2/2022

wind direction was from the east to north- east – that is, from the poultry sheds towards the Hibells. Notably, there were no further complaints during this time, even though during this period there were times when shed doors were open, ventilation rates were high, and birds were being removed. page 2987898 Supplementary report AFT farm December 2021- February 2022 43. The Hibells lodged a second complaint with the Council, on 8 February at 5.39 pm. Again the complaint

• pdf
• 4.5 MB
• Created: 02/1/2020

-307,615 48,198,724 Revenue from exchange transactions Direct charges revenue 254,888 285,963 -31,075 792,896 870,389 -77,493 4,376,777 Rent revenue 106,738 95,833 10,905 313,301 287,499 25,802 1,150,000 Dividends 0 4,000,000 -4,000,000 0 4,000,000 -4,000,000 8,000,000 Revenue from non-exchange transactions General rates revenue 0 0 0 1,988,598 1,988,598 0 7,954,392 Targeted rates revenue 0 0 0 1,492,806 1,492,793 13 5,971,173 …

• pdf
• 587 KB
• Created: 23/4/2016

Effluent management aside, Options one and two are similar in expecting water ways fenced and riparian margins managed with timeframes to have this work completed before a regulatory regime is implemented for those yet to meet the deadlines. The major difference between these two policies is implementing land based effluent irrigation in all but exceptional circumstances. In relation to the first two policy options, this report finds that: • If the rate of fencing experienced in the

• pdf
• 2.4 MB
• Created: 09/2/2019

present rates to use it. This should never have even been considered. Vote NO 8 Ross Calgher 1 1 We have as ratepayers already paid in the way of our rates many times for this white elephant now you want to on top of what we are paying to fix the disgusting work that has been done, the millions that were spent not years ago upgrading kitchens etc. just before oh Dear we are not earth quake proof. That have not been used???/. That upgrade should not have been done till the

• pdf
• 1.5 MB
• Created: 05/1/2019

low impact recreation use  The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge Very high Overall Rating Outstanding annotation https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7 https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7 page 1 4 6 C O A S T A L P L A N F O R T A R

• pdf
• 886 KB
• Created: 22/4/2018

The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge Very high Overall Rating Outstanding page 1 2 4 C O A S T A L P L A N F O R T A R A N A K I S c h e d u le 2 – C o a s t a l a r e a s o f o u t s t a n d in g v a lu e Parininihi. page 125 CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I

• pdf
• 886 KB
• Created: 07/1/2016

The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge Very high Overall Rating Outstanding page 1 2 4 C O A S T A L P L A N F O R T A R A N A K I S c h e d u le 2 – C o a s t a l a r e a s o f o u t s t a n d in g v a lu e Parininihi. page 125 CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I

• PDF
• 1.7 MB
• Created: 01/1/2022

continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and

• pdf
• 3.3 MB
• Created: 23/4/2016

River was confirmed following the review of the RPS in 2010. Policy 3.1.1 seeks to retain as far as possible in their natural state, the quantities levels and rates of flow of water and the quality of water within the Hangatahua (Stony) catchment. In addition to the objectives and policies seeking to protect the Hangatahua (Stony) River, Policy 6.1.1 of the Freshwater Plan identified two other catchments or reaches where the taking and use of water