(particularly consent holders). It further enables the Council to
continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource
management, and ultimately through the refinement of methods, to move closer to
achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources.
Evaluation of environmental performance 1.1.4
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with
Implementation Leads maintain a full project Risk and Opportunity Register.
The following are issues in that Register that Leads believe, due to significance or the types of actions required, should be communicated to this
Committee.
Description Effect Mitigation Strategy
Risk Rating
(unmitigated)
Actions being taken
Effective interaction
with tangata whenua
Demands from increased
consultation on a number of
fronts are placing limits on
iwi ability to engage with
excelsa), Miro (Prumnopitys ferruginea) and
Matai (Prumnopitys taxifolia) and is generally in good condition. The
understorey and ground cover is in good condition and is made up of a wide
number of shrub species including Kawakawa (Piper excelsum), Kanono
(Coprosma grandifolia), and Coprosma areolata along with a wide range of
ferns. Also of note is a small area containing Swamp maire (Syzygium
maire) and the fern Deparia petersenii subsp. congrua (both rated
Regionally Distinctive).
be abstracted for
washing at quarries fit within the permitted activity rule [Rule 15] of the Regional
Fresh Water Plan for Taranaki. That is, the abstraction volume shall not exceed 50 cubic
metres per day, and the abstraction rate shall not exceed 1.5 litres per second.
1.4.2 Water discharge permit
Section 15(1)(a) of the RMA stipulates that no person may discharge any contaminant
into water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in
a
(RFWP) for Taranaki.
Graham Harris (2000) Limited holds no water abstraction permit. The water volume
and abstraction rate required to service the Company’s operations are less than 50
cubic metres per day and 1.5 litres per second respectively, therefore the activity is
permitted under Rule 15 of the RFWP.
Water discharge permit 1.4.2
Section 15(1)(a) of the Resource Management Act stipulates that no person may
discharge any contaminant into water, unless the activity is
Board Update and presentation
5.1 Mr B Clayton-Smith and Ms I Chamberlain, Taranaki District Health Board, provided
a presentation updating the Committee.
5.2 Based on projections it is anticipated that Taranaki will reach 90% vaccination rates by
Christmas.
5.3 A waste water sample that was taken on Monday from Stratford has returned a
positive result. This would now indicate that this was not a person passing through
Stratford and that there is a case or cases in
Policy & Planning Committee agenda October 2021
performance and extent of compliance by
STOS, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative
performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with STOS’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance
in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to
development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative