2016/17 Actual 2015/16 Actual 2014/15 Actual 2013/14 General rates $10.94m $10.94m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m Percent change 37.6% 37.6% 0% 0% 0% 4.5% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 1.4% 1.5% General rates to income 25.9% 22.8% 15.7% 18.3% 18.3% 22.2% 28.5% 30.0% 30.0% 30.2% 29.9% Rates per $100,000 capital value $24.13 $24.13 $24.17 $25.80 $25.80 $14.17 $15.55 $15.99 $16.64 $16.71 $17.18 Total expenditure $41.2m $49.7m $41.2m $37.8m $37.8m $31.3m
document containing your answers, please refer to the document name and the relevant page number in the text box. Give full details of the source of the discharge and any treatment it will receive prior to discharge: These details are provided in sections 3 and 5 of the attached Assessment of Environmental Effects. Liquids discharged to water What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge? Rate 150000 Unit Litres per second How frequent is the discharge? Not
Management Plan SPR Special Purpose Road STDC South Taranaki District Council STE Stock Truck Effluent TEFAR Targeted Enhanced Financial Assistance Rate TIO Transport Investment Online TP Transport Programme TRC Taranaki Regional Council TSIG Transport Special Interest Group VKT Vehicle Kilometres Travelled Regional Transport Committee - Confirmation of RTAG Minutes - October and November 2023 15 page @BCL@401CED03 Taranaki Regional
resource consents held by Fonterra for the Whareroa site 5 Table 3 Summary of abstraction rate data for 2021-2022 10 Table 4 Limits for stormwater composition for each parameter (consents 3902, 3907, 4133) 12 Table 5 Sample results for the stormwater discharge to an unnamed tributary of the Tawhiti Stream 13 Table 6 Sample results for the stormwater discharge to an unnamed tributary of the Tangahoe River 14 Table 7 Sample results for the stormwater discharge to an unnamed coastal
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are
the on- site activities, and compliance with the conditions of the consents during the period under review. The monitoring programme for this year included nine inspections, one water sampling survey, one soil sampling survey, and two in-stream biomonitoring surveys. During the monitoring period, the site generally demonstrated a level of administrative performance that requires improvement in terms of annual reporting. The environmental performance is rated ‘good’ rather than high’ due to
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are
performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II. For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were
extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II. For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental performance and