Berg et al. (1998) Toxicokinetic model The fate of a toxic chemical once inside the body. Refers in this case to the elimination rate of TCDD. page i A Study of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin August 2004 (TCDD) Exposures in Paritutu, New Zealand SUMMARY Background In October 2001 the Ministry of Health (MoH) contracted the Institute of Environmental Science & Research (ESR) to investigate non-occupational exposure to dioxins among residents of
of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance
(or multiple documents) in the "Documents" step. If you upload a document containing your answers, please refer to the document name and the relevant page number in the text box. Give full details of the source of the discharge and any treatment it will receive prior to discharge: These details are provided in sections 3 and 5 of the attached Assessment of Environmental Effects. Liquids discharged to water What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge? Rate 1180.0
levels. This had been addressed through extension of the irrigation disposal system in 2007-2008, and by more intensive wastewater and groundwater monitoring. During the year under review, there was a higher nitrogen load applied to the paddocks than in the 2017-2020 years. The nitrogen application rates increased by about 14% on Farm 1 and 20% on Farms 2 and 3 in the 2019-2020 year, with further increases of 10% on Farm 1, 4% on Farm 2, and 18% on Farm 3 during the year under review. On Farm 3,
4,000,000 8,000,000 -4,000,000 8,000,000 Revenue from non-exchange transactions General rates revenue 2,950,334 2,950,334 0 8,851,002 8,851,002 0 11,801,335 Targeted rates revenue 1,191,446 1,191,453 -6 3,574,340 3,574,359 -20 4,765,811 Direct charges revenue 277,886 187,111 90,775 2,597,450 3,063,727 -466,277 11,229,886 Government grants 358,887 194,091 164,796 3,119,301 2,303,728 815,573 3,750,071 Vested assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total income 5,024,823
effect on the date the Council approves the Supplier as a New Supplier following receipt of a duly completed and signed ‘Creditors Form’ showing acceptance of these Terms, and will continue in force until terminated. PRICE, INVOICING AND PAYMENT Consideration: In full consideration of the satisfactory provision of the Goods and/or Services, the Council shall remunerate the Supplier in accordance with the rates and prices stipulated in the Purchase Order (Fee). The Council shall
keeping 11 2.3.2.1 Rate and time of effluent application 11 2.3.2.2 Area (ha) that effluent is applied and total volume applied 11 2.3.2.3 Method of irrigation 12 2.3.2.4 Type of crops grown 12 2.3.3 Cut and carry operation 12 2.3.4 Total nitrogen and potassium in the effluent 13 2.3.5 Nutrient management 13 2.3.6 Nitrogen loading 13 2.3.7 Potassium loading 14 2.3.8 Cut and carry operation 14 2.4 Incidents, investigations, and interventions 15 page
applications relating to the continued operation and maintenance of the Mangorei HEPS. Is a structure on, under, or over a river bed required? No What is the maximum rate of taking proposed (litres/second)? 10000 What is the maximum rate of taking proposed (cubic metres per day)? 864000 What is the maximum volume proposed to be taken in a 7- day period (m3)? 6048000 Please indicate below how your taking will vary through a typical year Maximum or near to
development of the region’s resources. Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
No What is the maximum rate of taking proposed (litres/second)? 3160 What is the maximum rate of taking proposed (cubic metres per day)? 136512 What is the maximum volume proposed to be taken in a 7- day period (m3)? 955584 Please indicate below how your taking will vary through a typical year Maximum or near to maximum: Jul May Jun Less than maximum: Dec Jan Feb No taking expected: Jan Explain any variation in