where this entered the
Mangaotuku Stream. A composite sample was collected from the sawdust pile.
11 June 2021
The site was visited during fine weather with no recent significant rain. The clean fill was of similar
appearance to the previous inspection and no new material was observed. No unauthorised material was
observed and no odours were noted. Additional grass growth had occurred on the lower section since the
previous visit.
2.1.2 Results of discharged wood waste
Wood waste
Policy & Planning Committee agenda February 2021
investigating the impact of localised weather events.
3.4 A key next step is to commission a report on climate change impacts for the region.
Recommended
That the Taranaki Regional Council:
a) receives the memorandum 'Sediment load reductions for freshwater planning and soil
conservation in Taranaki'
b) notes the recommendations of the authors and officers regarding future work.
Boyde/Van Der Leden
4. Towards Predator-Free Taranaki Project
4.1 Mr S Ellis, spoke to
and 235° (as a 1-hour average); [or
alternatively if predictions are in cardinal directions rather than in degrees
“Wind from all directions except north, north-northwest, northwest, west-
northwest, west and west-southwest”]; or,
ii. Wind speeds of greater than 10 m/s (as a 1-hour average)
b. The use of misting devices at the end of the sheds where spent litter is being loaded
out.
(viii) Wind speed and wind direction as recorded by the onsite weather station shall be recorded
is 10 L/s. However as a result of stormwater inputs to the pond, the discharge
rate from the pond to the Mangorei Stream will be highly variable as it is dependent on weather conditions.
The size of the pond will allow storage for a 10% annual exceedance event (AEP) event. The maximum
discharge rate from the pond during large rainfall events is 1,060 L/s as this is dictated by the size of the
page
5
outfall pipe (750 mm). However there is also provision for the pond
Inspections
The site was inspected on two occasions in 2012-2013 period. The findings of the
inspections are given below.
2.1.1 31 October 2012
A site visit was made to conduct a compliance monitoring inspection and to take water
samples. The weather was fine with no rain over the previous 48 hours. No visual
effects were noted in the stream during sampling and both samples were clear and had
no odour. No leachate seepages or exposed refuse were observed and the cap was
sound. The
inspections
focussed on the presence or absence of unacceptable materials, the stability of the green
waste stacks (against wind), and the management of any stormwater and leachate.
page
7
2. Results
2.1 Inspections
23 October 2013
A site visit was made to conduct a compliance monitoring inspection. The weather was
showery with seven mm of rain falling over the previous 24 hours.
There did not appear to have been much activity at the site since the last inspection.
Remediation hearing - applicant's evidence - expert evidence (monitoring & nitrogen)
occasions during the monitoring year under review.
Results of the survey performed on 26 November 2018 are presented in Table 4. On this occasion the
stream was running at a moderate steady flow, relatively clear and uncoloured. The ponds’ treated
wastewater discharge was estimated at about 1.0 L/s and very light brown with no organic odour being
recognised in the sample. The weather was overcast at the time of sampling. The wastewater discharge from
page
8
the wetland
dunes and dune grasses appeared to be mostly stable.
14 January 2019
Weather conditions were overcast and fine during the inspection. The camp was moderately busy at the
time of inspection, with approximately 500 campers present on site. The camp manager reported that the
beach camp’s wastewater treatment system had been operating without issue over summer and had been
regularly maintained. No visual issues or odours were detected at the pump station during the inspection.
Water