The Regional Policy Statement (RPS) has a ten year life
with an interim review after five years. The Statement was
prepared pursuant to the statutory process outlined in the
Resource Management Act 1991. This involves a full public
consultative procedure. Discussion documents outlining
issues were prepared prior to the commencement of the
statutory process.
Regional Air Quality Plan for Taranaki 2011.
The purpose of the Plan is to promote the sustainable
management of natural
number of consents issued at the end of each month for
this year and the previous two years
• Breakdown of consents issued. This is the number of consents issued broken down
by purpose – new, renewals, changes or review
• Types of consents issued, further broken down into notification types – non-
notified, limited notified or public notified
• Number of times that the public and iwi were involved in an application process for
the year so far
• Application processing time
Policy
Statement.
Progress on the ongoing engagement, research,
investigations and information gathering underpinning
the development of a Proposed Freshwater and Land
Plan continued. Key activities for 2017/2018 were the
commissioning of a study on recommended
environmental flow limits, the ongoing development of
a freshwater accounting system, and the setting of draft
regional swimmability targets.
The Council also completed a non-statutory five-yearly
interim review of
previous two years
b. Potential hearings table outlining the status of applications where a hearing is anticipated and the
decision maker(s) (e.g. a hearing panel) has been appointed
c. Consents issued table - the number of consents issued at the end of each month for this year and
the previous two years
d. Breakdown of consents issued. This is the number of consents issued broken down by purpose –
new, renewals, changes or review
e. Types of consents issued, further broken
and programmes .......................................... 18
5.1 Interim review of the efficiency and effectiveness of the Freshwater Plan ...................... 18
5.2 Council studies and investigations ........................................................................................ 19
5.2.1 Wetland studies and investigations ............................................................................................................ 19
5.2.2 Council studies and
2.2 Physiochemical sampling 9
2.2.1 Groundwater 9
2.2.2 Hydraulic fracturing and return fluids 11
2.3 Investigations, interventions, and incidents 13
3 Discussion 15
3.1 Environmental effects of exercise of consents 15
3.2 Evaluation of performance 15
page
ii
3.3 Alterations to monitoring programmes of future hydraulic fracturing events 17
3.4 Exercise of optional review of consent 17
4 Recommendations 18
Glossary of common terms and abbreviations
page
i
TARANAKI REGIONAL COUNCIL
Freshwater Abstractions Permitted
Activity Review
May 2015
Dr Mike Patrick
MERMAN Ltd
Phone 03 528 8187
Mobile 021 277 0240
page
ii
Prepared for Taranaki Regional Council
Report prepared by Dr Mike Patrick
Reviewed by TRC
Date May 2015
Report status FINAL
page
iii
Contents
1 Introduction
stock exclusion requirements .......................................... 26
5.6 Opportunities and constraints for extending the Riparian Programme into the eastern
hill country? .............................................................................................................................. 27
5.7 Have the plans been effective? ............................................................................................... 28
5.7.1 Interim review of the freshwater and soil
Tsunami Inundation Analysis
Update 2017
Prepared by:
Ir. Craig Goodier: Principal Engineer (Modelling)
Reviewed by:
Ir. Gary Clode: Manager Engineering
June 2017
AM 17/08
HBRC Plan Number 4936
© Copyright: Hawke’s Bay Regional Council
page
page
Taranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis
Table of Contents
1 Summary ______________________________________________________ 1
2 Study
Taranaki Committee Membership
Chief Executive, Mr S J Ruru, introduced the item and answered questions.
Resolved
That the Taranaki Regional Council:
a) received the memorandum Wild for Taranaki Committee Membership
b) agreed that the appropriate mechanism to monitor and engage with Wild for
Taranaki are through:
• regular reviews of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Wild
for Taranaki and TRC; and
• annual reports on Wild for Taranaki performance against the MoU