Your search for 'rates' returned 2126 results.

Oaonui Water Supply Ltd Monitoring Programme Annual Report 2021-2022

Consent 10314-1 14 List of figures Figure 1 The location of the OWSL site and its associated water service area 3 Figure 2 Seven-day volume (consent limit 28,000 m3) 7 Figure 3 Daily abstraction rate (consent limit 50 L/s) 7 Figure 4 Macroinvertebrate index results recorded in the Oaonui Stream in relation to the OWSL Stream Weir, October 2021 9 Figure 5 Macroinvertebrate index results recorded in the Oaonui Stream in relation to the OWSL Stream Weir, March 2022 10

Application form 20 04888 2 0 Trustpower 25 Nov 2020

document containing your answers, please refer to the document name and the relevant page number in the text box. Give full details of the source of the discharge and any treatment it will receive prior to discharge: These details are provided in sections 3 and 5 of the attached Assessment of Environmental Effects. Liquids discharged to water What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge? Rate 150000 Unit Litres per second How frequent is the discharge? Not

Fonterra Whareroa Monitoring Programme Annual Report 2021-2022

resource consents held by Fonterra for the Whareroa site 5 Table 3 Summary of abstraction rate data for 2021-2022 10 Table 4 Limits for stormwater composition for each parameter (consents 3902, 3907, 4133) 12 Table 5 Sample results for the stormwater discharge to an unnamed tributary of the Tawhiti Stream 13 Table 6 Sample results for the stormwater discharge to an unnamed tributary of the Tangahoe River 14 Table 7 Sample results for the stormwater discharge to an unnamed coastal

C D Boyd Drilling Waste and Stockpiling Land & Landspreading Annual Report 2021-2022

the on- site activities, and compliance with the conditions of the consents during the period under review. The monitoring programme for this year included nine inspections, one water sampling survey, one soil sampling survey, and two in-stream biomonitoring surveys. During the monitoring period, the site generally demonstrated a level of administrative performance that requires improvement in terms of annual reporting. The environmental performance is rated ‘good’ rather than high’ due to

NPDC Urenui and Onaero Beach Camps Annual Report 2021-2022

management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are

McKechnie Aluminium Annual Report 2021-2022

management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are

Concrete Batching Plants Annual Report 2021-2022

performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II. For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were

Methanex Motunui and Waitara Valley Combined Annual Report 2021-2022

extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II. For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental performance and