Agenda
Agenda for Ordinary Council meeting December 2017.
Agenda for Ordinary Council meeting December 2017.
discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management
achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by SDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
habitat loss or the impact of invasive plants and animals. Habitat loss (through land clearance and drainage) has historically been the main pressure on biodiversity. While the rate of land clearance and drainage has declined in recent times, the ongoing loss and modification of remnant habitats remains an issue, particularly on privately owned land in Taranaki. Even small losses of habitat can now have a disproportionate impact on remaining biodiversity – not only in terms of
Council kerbside collections 3. Volume of household waste diverted to recycling Figure 3 shows the portion of kerbside waste that is collected for recycling for each council. The introduction of the new kerbside recycling in 2015 is evident with an increase in the portion of waste recycled, particularly in New Plymouth and Stratford. Stratford’s recycling rate is 25% which is under the target of 29% of kerbside waste being recycled by 2023, however there is a slight …
(KiwiRAP). KiwiRAP provides a consistent assessment of the infrastructure safety level of New Zealand roads. SH3 between New Plymouth and Waitara has a KiwiRAP rating of 2-stars. This indicates the road has limited infrastructure safety including low shoulder width, and fails to achieve the level of service required for a Regional road. This is likely to pose further safety risk for cyclists and walkers. Figure 6 displays regional KiwiRAP ratings for comparison. Figure 6: KiwiRAP
Revenue from exchange transactions Direct charges revenue 339,644 298,463 41,181 3,776,408 4,088,813 -312,405 4,376,777 Rent revenue 135,321 95,833 39,488 1,273,244 1,054,163 219,081 1,150,000 Dividends 0 0 0 8,000,000 8,000,000 0 8,000,000 Revenue from non-exchange transactions General rates revenue 1,988,598 1,988,598 0 7,954,392 7,954,392 0 7,954,392 Targeted rates revenue 1,492,806 1,492,794 12 5,971,225 5,971,173 52 5,971,173 Direct charges
holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review.
noted that this trend analysis is by its nature assessing trends in the percentage cover of periphyton when surveyed under conditions most conducive to the greatest proliferation, rather than in periphyton all year round. Trend analyses for periphyton were performed by applying a LOWESS fit to a time scatterplot of the percentage cover for thick mats and long filaments of periphyton. Next, the Mann-Kendall analyses test followed by Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) analyses were
the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance