Plan set out in Appendix A to this order;
page
2
(2) The following appeals are otherwise dismissed:
(a) Energy Resources Aotearoa Incorporated (ENV-2019-AKL-297);
and
(b) Taranaki Energy Watch Incorporated (ENV-2019-AKL-299).
B: Under section 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, there is no order
as to costs.
REASONS
Introduction
[1] These appeals concern Taranaki Regional Council’s (the Council) decisions
on the Proposed Taranaki Coastal
proposed
Taranaki Coastal Plan set out in Appendix A to this order;
(2) The appeal points from Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New
Zealand Incorporated's appeal set out in paragraph [7] of this order are
confirmed as withdrawn.
(3) Topic 1 (Biodiversity) and Topic 3 (Infrastructure and Industry) are
resolved. Topic 4 (Oil and Gas) remains extant; and
( 4) The appeals by F onterra Limited, the Minister of Conservation, and Royal
Forest and Bird Protection
N Volzke Mayor - Stratford District Council
P Nixon Mayor - South Taranaki District Council
M Chong New Plymouth District Council
L Stewart Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Attending A Harris Stratford District Council
S Bowden Stratford District Council
R Leitao New Plymouth District Council
V Lim South Taranaki District Council
S Downs Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
A Gurney New Zealand Police (zoom)
M Nield Taranaki
Here's where you can find out about the Coastal Plan review process. Between 2017 and 2023 the Council reviewed its first generation Regional Coastal Plan and undertook a fulsome engagement process with tangata whenua, stakeholders and the wider community. The timeline below identifies the major stages in the review process: September 2016 – the Council released a draft Coastal Plan for public review. 101 responses were received.
February 2018 – the Council notified the Proposed Coastal Plan
Here's where you can find out about the Coastal Plan review process. Between 2017 and 2023 the Council reviewed its first generation Regional Coastal Plan and undertook a fulsome engagement process with tangata whenua, stakeholders and the wider community. The timeline below identifies the major stages in the review process: September 2016 – the Council released a draft Coastal Plan for public review. 101 responses were received.
February 2018 – the Council notified the Proposed Coastal Plan
level of service provision for any significant
activity undertaken by or on behalf of the Council, or transfer the ownership or control
of a strategic asset to or from the Council.
Membership of the Ordinary Committee
Councillor D N MacLeod (Chairperson)
Councillor M P Joyce (Deputy Chairperson)
Councillor M J Cloke
Councillor M G Davey
Councillor D L Lean
Councillor C L Littlewood
Councillor M J McDonald
Councillor D H McIntyre
Councillor E D
for consultation for as long as
possible to await the release of a revised GPS and other related documents. Should the
Plan be decided to be released for consultation as it currently stands, it will be done in
the knowledge that changes will need to be made to the Plan post-consultation in order
to ensure the Plan is aligned with the Government’s transport priorities.
4.4 The Committee were advised that the Waikato Regional Council and Bay of Plenty
Regional Council have released
of the Waitara Express, we’re running a competition
for youth (aged 5-18 years) to design the back of the bus. The theme is ‘I
Heart Waitara’ so put your imagination on wheels and be in to win.
The winner will have their awesome design printed on the back of the Waitara Express bus
AND win a $150 Prezzy Card. Highly commended and spot prizes also up for grabs!
Entries must be received by 4pm Monday 22 April 2024. The winner will be announced by Friday 26 April 2024.
For
implemented by the Council in relation to these hydraulic fracturing
activities spanned the 2018-2019, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 monitoring years. Monitoring included pre and
post-discharge groundwater sampling. Two biomonitoring surveys were also carried out on a tributary of
the Parahaki Stream in relation to the hydraulic fracturing programme. Samples of hydraulic fracturing
fluids, and fluids returning to the wellhead post-fracturing, were also obtained for physicochemical analysis
in order to
Messenger (south of the
existing site) in conjunction with the Mt Messenger bypass works. It would likely
be a discharge to land facility, with NZTA partially covering construction costs and
ongoing maintenance sitting with NPDC. While this matter has been raised with
members of the Mt Messenger Bypass team, it needs to gain greater traction in
order for this opportunity not to be missed. While the disposal site is outside the
scope of the Bypass project itself, synergies exist in terms of