holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of
methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving
sustainable development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in accordance
with
details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management
methods, and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to
achieving sustainable development of the regions resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely
conditions, the disposal of produced
waters by DWI should have no more than negligible environmental effects.
The injection of fluids into hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs is also an established
oilfield technique for regulating reservoir pressure and/or as a means of enhancing
the rate of oil recovery from a reservoir. This process is often referred to as water
flooding. Water flooding is a secondary recovery process that is often implemented
when natural reservoir pressures decline due to the
conditions, the disposal of produced
waters by DWI should have no more than negligible environmental effects.
The injection of fluids into hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs is also an established
oilfield technique for regulating reservoir pressure and/or as a means of enhancing
the rate of oil recovery from a reservoir. This process is often referred to as water
flooding. Water flooding is a secondary recovery process that is often implemented
when natural reservoir pressures decline due to the
gardening books, and these will soon be
available to borrow through an on-line catalogue
Note, the Members Lounge and Boardroom are kept locked with access via a keypad. The pin number
for the keypad changes annually. The number will be sent to you along with your member’s card.
• Discounts when hiring the Studio or booking events at the Lodge. For new members, this discounted
rate is available after six months.
• Volunteering in the garden and during public events.
• Full voting
through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned
summer-autumn under low flow conditions
during the monitoring period (at which time the Waverley system was being desludged with
bio-bugs, the Manaia system had been upgraded with the addition of two wetlands, the
Kaponga pond subsurface discharge rate was very low and receiving water dilution very high,
and the Patea upgraded ponds system discharged continuously), or on other occasions when
monitoring of impacts was required by specific consent conditions. This monitoring continued
the increased
problem
• We have used t-tests to determine whether two percentages are different from each other. With each t-test that is done, we incur a probability of a Type I error (rejection of a true
null hypothesis or in other words ‘false positive’). The probability of committing a Type I error is the significance level of the test, which is set to 5%. When doing multiple tests, the
Type I error rate is inflated. We have used the false discovery rate (FDR) method to control the expected proportion