of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the cxonsent holder’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the consent holder’s approach to demonstrating
consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
page
69
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Resource Management Act Charging Policy
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES PURSUANT TO
SECTION 36 OF THE RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT ACT 1991
SCHEDULE 1: SCALE OF CHARGES FOR
STAFF TIME
Rate for
processing
resource
consents and
responding to
pollution
incidents.
Rate for
all other
Council
work.
Professional staff $88/hr $83/hr
Professional/supervisory staff $112/hr $104/hr
Managers $162/hr
Yarrow Stadium value to the Taranaki community - Business & Economic Research Ltd (BERL)
its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative
can result in legal action by the Taranaki Regional
Council.
Recommended proximity to dwellings and public roads: not within 150m of any
dwelling house and not within 20m of any road. Effluent can cause a nuisance to the
public because of its odour and it may attract flies.
4.2 Area required
Apply up to 200kg/ha of nitrogen each year. This limit is used throughout New Zealand as
the generally accepted upper limit beneficial to pastures. A higher rate may result in high
as those between 30 and 180 kHz.
page
132013 Code of Conduct for Minimising Acoustic Disturbance to Marine Mammals
3.8.8 Acoustic source tests
Seismic source tests will be subject to the relevant soft start procedures for each survey
level, though the 20-minute minimum duration does not apply. Where possible, power
should be built up gradually to the required test level at a rate not exceeding that of a
normal soft start. Level 1 and 2 seismic source tests with a maximum
a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in
performance may not be achieved:
Nil.
The following performance measures are noted as being red. That is, performance to date has not achieved the target or the
performance for the rest of the year is unlikely to achieve the target:
Investment management: The Council’s Investment Policy has a 6% target for interest returns. The Local Government Act 2002 requires
the Council to set a target. In the current interest rate environment, the Council is unlikely to reach
through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with
single programme), together with additional programmes for hydrocarbon
exploration and development activities. Consent holders have been assessed on environmental performance and on consent
compliance. The ratings for these consent holders were found to be 71% ‘high’ and 24% ‘good’. By the end of March 2017, all reports for
2016/2017 had been completed. A similar number of specific monitoring programmes are being delivered in 2016/2017. The farm dairy
effluent monitoring programme