Your search for 'rates' returned 2231 results.

Agenda

follow.  The current Cost Benefit Ratio has 10+ ratings whereas the new two stage process has four.  A new Very High rating has been introduced.  Consultation is open until 21 April 2017. FR will draft a regional submission for the RTAG to review via email. DCs indicated that they are unlikely to submit separately at an organisational level.  The draft IAF for PT will be released on 27 April 2017. Long Term Strategic View (LTSV) WW introduced the LTSV, with key

Annual report 2015-2016

During the period under review, Port Taranaki Ltd obtained a ‘high’ rating for environmental and administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents. Suspended solids remained well below consent limits it all samples analysed. There were no recorded incidents. The environmental performance of Port Taranaki Ltd has continued to improve from previous years. During the same period, Downer New Zealand Ltd, Technix Taranaki Terminal Ltd, Methanex New Zealand and New Zealand Oil

Report and recommendation on Urenui Beach seawall (2007)

job to be completed before there is more land erosion, and to avoid costs of temporary measures. Seeks for the wall to be finished with no conditions. Ian Noel Bullock Support N To ensure the foreshore camping and recreational facilities can be kept safe and intact for the future Ian Parker Support N Completion of the wall as soon as possible to stop erosion. Jason Quickenden Support N Installation of rock wall to stop erosion of Urenui Beach. It is costing rate payers money to try and

Annual report 2013-2014

regions resources. Evaluation of environmental performance 1.1.4 Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is

Annual report 2013-2014

observable and/or ongoing effects upon soil and groundwater quality associated with the land disposal process • effective incorporation of material, application rates and associated earthworks • integrity and management of storage facilities • dust and odour effects in proximity of the site boundaries • housekeeping and site management • the neighbourhood was surveyed for environmental effects. 1.5.4 Chemical sampling During the monitoring period the Council collected six composite

Outfall ecological report 2011-2013

exceed 11,950 m3, rate of discharge not to exceed 138 L/s Data submitted to TRC in monthly and annual reports by NPDC (Appendix IV). Yes 2. Cease discharge after Waitara to New Plymouth pipeline is commissioned Pipeline due to be commissioned during summer 2014. N/A 3. pH 6-12 in at least 98% of discharge samples over 12 month period Data submitted to TRC in monthly and annual reports by NPDC (Appendix IV). Not quite: 97.3% pH 6-12 See Appendix IV 4.

Annual report 2012-2013

ecology inspection. The Company carried out air emission sampling and groundwater monitoring through independent consultants and further storm water sampling, and forwarded the results to the Council for audit and review. Processing rates continued to increase during the period, particularly for herbicides. The monitoring showed that the Company has had no significant impact on air quality in the vicinity of the plant or on water quality in the Herekawe Stream. No complaint about odour was

Todd deep well injection monitoring 2017-2018

Council to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their

Policy & Planning agenda June 2018

interventions and any evidence of a change in attainment of the NPS-FM swimmability criteria; the very high rate of attainment of swimmability in Taranaki if assessed against EU criteria instead of NPS-FM criteria; and the absence of any correlation between nutrient trends and macroinvertebrate community health trends 4. notes the report’s findings highlight the potential dangers of a ‘one size fits all’ problem analysis and solution imposition to water quality interventions at a national level