can result in substantial changes in sediment regimes.
Streams in pastureland generally have a greater sediment yield than those under forested areas
(Davis-Colley, 1997). National literature of erosion rates in New Zealand suggest erosion rates are
between 3 – 11 times higher in catchments under pasture than those under forest, and sediment
yields are 50 – 80 % higher in pastureland than forested catchments (Basher, 2013). The processes
operating on Mount Taranaki may be contrary to this,
(or multiple documents) in the
"Documents" step. If you upload a document containing your answers, please refer to the document name and the relevant
page number in the text box.
Give full details of the source of the discharge and any
treatment it will receive prior to discharge:
These details are provided in sections 3 and 5 of the attached
Assessment of Environmental Effects.
Liquids discharged to water
What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge?
Rate 1180.0
of water take are provided in the
attached Assessment of Environmental Effects.
This application is being made concurrently with six other
applications relating to the continued operation and
maintenance of the Mangorei HEPS.
Is a structure on, under, or over a river bed required? Yes
If a structure on, under, or over a river bed is needed please attach sketch plan of the structure including dimensions in the
"Documents" step.
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed
Operations and Regulatory Agenda Nov 2023 web
No
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed
(litres/second)?
3160
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed (cubic metres
per day)?
136512
What is the maximum volume proposed to be taken in a 7-
day period (m3)?
955584
Please indicate below how your taking will vary through a typical year
Maximum or near to maximum: Jul
May
Jun
Less than maximum: Dec
Jan
Feb
No taking expected: Jan
Explain any variation in
If a structure on, under, or over a river bed is needed please attach sketch plan of the structure including dimensions in the
"Documents" step.
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed
(litres/second)?
7787
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed (cubic metres
per day)?
336398
What is the maximum volume proposed to be taken in a 7-
day period (m3)?
2354786
Please indicate below how your taking will vary through a typical year
Maximum or near to
of receiving waters. In addition,
monthly emission results and abstraction records were provided to the Council which were reviewed.
The monitoring showed that the Stratford Power Station continued to be well managed with negligible
environmental effects as a process of the exercise of their consents.
Surface water abstraction was compliant with daily rate and volume. Process water discharges were
compliant with consent defined parameters. Surface water monitoring indicated negligible
continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s
2016/17
Actual
2015/16
Actual
2014/15
Actual
2013/14
General rates $10.94m $10.94m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m
Percent change 37.6% 37.6% 0% 0% 0% 4.5% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 1.4% 1.5%
General rates to
income 25.9% 22.8% 15.7% 18.3% 18.3% 22.2% 28.5% 30.0% 30.0% 30.2% 29.9%
Rates per
$100,000 capital
value
$24.13 $24.13 $24.17 $25.80 $25.80 $14.17 $15.55 $15.99 $16.64 $16.71 $17.18
Total expenditure $41.2m $49.7m $41.2m $37.8m $37.8m $31.3m
Table 3 CCCWSL backwash self-monitoring discharge sampling 6
Table 4 Summary of performance for Consent 1134-3.2 12
Table 5 Summary of performance for Consent 5454-2.0 13
Table 6 Summary of performance for Consent 6077-2 14
List of figures
Figure 1 CCCWSL’s water service area 3
Figure 2 CCCWSL abstraction rates for 2021-2022 7
Figure 3 CCCWSL residual flow compliance for 2021-2022 8
Figure 4 Location of biomonitoring sites in the Cold Stream in relation to the Cold