..................................... 18
Regional context (questions 3-7, 10-12) ........................................................................................................ 18
Working with iwi (Questions 8 and 9) ............................................................................................................ 22
CME operations (Questions 16-17, 20-21, 28-40) ...................................................................................... 22
Making decisions on priorities (Questions 16,
Committee Administrator
Mr T McElroy Environmental Scientist – Marine
Ms E Bowie Administration Officer
Ms Justine Gilliland Venture Taranaki
Ms Anne Probert Venture Taranaki
Mr Peter Boyd Venture Taranaki
One member of the media, Mr C Ashworth, Te Korimako o Taranaki.
Apologies Apologies were received from Councillors D N MacLeod, N W Walker and M G
Davey.
A note of sympathy was recorded for the passing of Iwi Representative, Mr
Members Councillors C L Littlewood Committee Chairperson
N W Walker Committee Deputy Chairperson
D M Davey
M J McDonald
D H McIntyre
C S Williamson
D N MacLeod ex officio
M P Joyce ex officio
Representative
Members Councillors C Young South Taranaki District Council
S Hitchcock New Plymouth District Council
G Boyde Stratford District Council
Mr P Moeahu Iwi Representative
Ms L Tester Iwi Representative
Ms B Bigham Iwi
from an incident which arose during the siege of Otaka
Pa by neighbouring northern iwi in 1832. When discussing terms for peace a chief from the neighbouring iwi,
sought permission to go into Otaka to hold a tangi for his dead warriors. One inhabitant, Te Whau, ran out
towards the taua, was killed and her body dismembered and thrown into the stream. The stream was then
called Waitapu - wai (water) and tapu (sacred). This stream still runs through Waitapu Urupa today.
In 1923
beyond the adjacent land, and if written approval is obtained from all those people who are likely to be
adversely affected in a minor or more than minor way. Council will determine the people who are likely to be adversely
affected and you will have the option of obtaining their written approval so that your application can be non-notified.
Are there any parties that may potentially
be affected by this proposal?
Yes
Name of affected party Iwi Forum (Mangorei Forum)
Contact
approval is obtained from all those people who are likely to be
adversely affected in a minor or more than minor way. Council will determine the people who are likely to be adversely
affected and you will have the option of obtaining their written approval so that your application can be non-notified.
Are there any parties that may potentially be affected by this
proposal?
Yes
Name of affected party Iwi Forum (Mangorei Forum)
Contact details N/A
Please outline any consultation
and you will have the option of obtaining their written approval so that your application can be non-notified.
Are there any parties that may potentially be affected by this
proposal?
Yes
Name of affected party Iwi Forum (Mangorei Forum)
Contact details NA
Please outline any consultation you have undertaken with this
party and the outcome.
This forum consists of the following iwi and hapu: Te
Kotahitanga o Te Atiawa Trust; Manukorihi hapū; Nga Mahanga
a Tairi;
(Long-Term-Plans/TRC-2024-34-Long-Term-Plan)
In accordance with statutory requirements a copy of this application may be sent to iwi for their
information.
The information you provide with your application is official information. It is used to help process your
resource consent application and assess the impact of your activity on the environment and other people.
Your information is held and administered by the Taranaki Regional Council in accordance with the Local
Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987
enforcement for the period 30 April 2020 to 21 May 2020.
3.2 An update was provided on the Ammonia leak from Silver Fern Farms. Further
information has been requested and the event is still under investigation.
3.3 Members requested to have comments from Iwi included in reports on major issues, it
was noted that if an incident was likely to end up in court, commentary cannot be
included as it could jeopardise the hearing.
3.4 It was noted that there was no ecological investigation into …