usefulness for monitoring purposes is studied as at
the moment they are uncapped and opened to the surface. It is possible that the water
samples from the wells encountered may be representative of different water-yielding
zones within the same aquifer; however, the data that could be obtained from them could
be used as up-gradient baseline conditions.
Unfortunately there is not enough topographical information available to determine
groundwater flow-lines and potentiometric groundwater maps
substance in, on
or under the foreshore or
seabed for other purposes
C3.7 • Deposit is in volumes of more than 50 000 cubic metres at a site in
any 12 month period, other than as provided for by rule C3.8.
Discretionary 1.1(d), 2.1, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 6.6,
7.4, 8.1, 9.10, 11.1, 11.2, 13.1,
14.1, 14.2, 14.3
C3.8 • Deposit is in volumes of more than 50 000 cubic metres in the area
marked `Spoil Disposal Area' on Map 7 of this plan, in any 12 month
period.
Discretionary 1.1(d),
Investigation of the
items in this inventory may mean more archaeological sites are considered in future district
plan reviews.
The greatest number of archaeological sites identified is in South Taranaki. These 976 sites are shown
individually on STDC district planning maps but no specific information about the sites is included in
the South Taranaki District Plan.
The majority of archaeological
sites in Taranaki are on private
land and the condition of sites
varies. A number of
sand at the
pit bases (approximately 4-5 m below surface). Average annual rainfall for the site is 1,023 mm (taken from
the nearby ‘Duffy’ monitoring station). As with the other South Taranaki coastal sites, this site is subject to
strong winds.
Site data
Location
Word descriptor: Manawapou Road, Manutahi, Taranaki
Map reference: E 1717244
(NZTM) N 5608736
Mean annual rainfall: 1,023 mm
Mean annual soil temperature: ~15.1°C
Mean annual soil
activity
and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the location of the activity, and an outline of the
matters covered by the company’s air discharge permit.
Subsection 2 presents the results of monitoring of the companies activities during the period under review,
including scientific and technical data.
Subsection 3 discusses the results, their interpretation, and their significance for the environment in the
immediate vicinity of the site under discussion.
for the period under review.
Each company’s activity is then discussed in a separate section (Sections 2 to 7).
In the subsections for each company (e.g. Section 2.1) there is a general description of the industrial activity
and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the location of the activity, and an outline of the
matters covered by the company’s air discharge permit.
Subsection 2 presents the results of monitoring of the company’s activities during the period
of the monitoring programme in place for the period under review.
Each company’s activity is then discussed in a separate section (Sections 2 to 6).
In the subsections for each company (e.g. Section 2.1) there is a general description of
the industrial activity and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the
location of the activity, and an outline of the matters covered by the company’s air
discharge permit.
Subsection 2 presents the results of monitoring of the
the same level of protection to
instream fauna across the full range of river/stream sizes. Following discussions with iwi and the Wai
Maori Group post the publication of the 2019 report, it was agreed that additional work was
required to test these assumptions in both small streams and large rivers.
Instream habitat surveys were initially carried out at sites on 12 Taranaki streams and rivers
(Kapoaiaia, Kaupokonui, Manganui, Mangaoraka, Patea, Tangahoe, Waingongoro (2 sites),
lost? Can
smaller fragments be linked to create
corridors or stepping stones (for instance
along streams or over ridges) that connect
larger bush areas? What does the
neighbour have by way of existing bush,
that could be connected?
For advice about layout, contact the
Council. A land management officer can
visit to assess the stand, and prepare a
conservation plan with a map showing
layout of the area to be retired, fence
positions and cost estimates.
Fencing
The next
OMV Pohokura Production Station resource consent monitoring report 2019-2020