Management Plan SPR Special Purpose Road STDC South Taranaki District Council STE Stock Truck Effluent TEFAR Targeted Enhanced Financial Assistance Rate TIO Transport Investment Online TP Transport Programme TRC Taranaki Regional Council TSIG Transport Special Interest Group VKT Vehicle Kilometres Travelled Regional Transport Committee - Confirmation of RTAG Minutes - October and November 2023 15 page @BCL@401CED03 Taranaki Regional
3 and 5 of the attached Assessment of Environmental Effects. page Liquids discharged to water What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge? Rate 2000.0 Unit Litres per second How frequent is the discharge? Not constant Hours per day 0.00 Days per week 0.00 Other Give full details of the method of discharge: The discharge will occur on an as required basis when flows in the Motukawa Race are high. Further details of the
"Documents" step. If you upload a document containing your answers, please refer to the document name and the relevant page number in the text box. Give full details of the source of the discharge and any treatment it will receive prior to discharge: These details are provided in sections 3 and 5 of the attached Assessment of Environmental Effects. Liquids discharged to water What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge? Rate 7787.0 Unit Litres per second How
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The
by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II. For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental performance and compliance for 88% of the
through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement
Risk Cause and Effect Mitigation Strategy Risk Rating (unmitigated) Comments (including current actions) Challenges in conducting effective engagement with tangata whenua as required under the NPS-FM. Challenges in tangata whenua resourcing and the timelines that the TRC is required to meet may place pressure on the ability of staff to engage fully with iwi and hapū. Additionally, this pressure can lead to a misalignment
through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each companies environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high,