Your search for 'rates' returned 2335 results.

Annual report 2014-2015

effects emanating offsite. The final marine Ecological Survey also confirmed that over time there had been nothing to suggest the activities undertaken at the site had caused an adverse effect in the specific analysed areas. While the legacy issue still remains, given the absence of measurable adverse effects and less than minor offsite effects the Environmental performance has been rated as ‘Good’ rather than ‘Improvement required’. Administrative performance was rated as high.

Regional Transport agenda June 2018

on a regional submission, FR and JB will put together a draft submission for the group to feed into. Points of concern include no mention of changes to FAR rates and New Plymouth not listed as a high growth urban area. An upcoming IAF workshop is being held on 26 April 2018 in Wellington. CC, SB and VL will be attending. Await feedback from this workshop to assist with submission. Funding from the Regional Improvement activity class will continue to be directed by NZTA as it is now.

2021/2022 schedules of charges

… page 174 Appendix 6: Charging Policies Resource Management Act Charging Policy Schedule of Charges Pursuant to Section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 SCHEDULE 1: SCALE OF CHARGES FOR STAFF TIME Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $97/hr $92/hr Professional/supervisory staff $123/hr $115/hr Managers $178/hr $166/hr Support staff $97/hr $92/hr Directors

Summer 2013-2014

multiple correlations are undertaken, there is a chance that some will be found to be significant purely by chance. In order to deal with this potential problem, the Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) method was applied to the results of the Mann-Kendall test. Further justification for this statistical approach can be found in Stark and Fowles (2006). page 8 Figure 1 SEM beach bathing bacteriological survey sites page 9 4. Results

Form 221: Drill bore or well

Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.5

JD Hickman consent monitoring 2020-2021

various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Trust, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Trust’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the

Rules 46-51: Groundwater

rate of abstraction shall not exceed 1.5l/s;  The bore shall be located not less than 500m from the sea or adjacent bores;  The well shall be located not less than 25m from the sea or adjacent wells or surface water bodies;  The well or bore shall be located not less than 50m from any effluent treatment pond, septic tank, silage stack or pit. Permitted Taking and use of groundwater (continued) Activity Rule Standards/Terms/Conditions Classification

Subs 411 526 web

Ordinary Meeting to hear submissions on the 2019/2020 Plan - List of Submissions received (526) and scanned copies 1004 page inability to provide certainty over All Blacks fixtures in the regions and the cost to bring such fixtures to Taranaki compared to the benefits of hosting other sporting fixtures (i.e. national secondary schools tournament week) The impact of a substantial rates increase on our aging population and on our District to increase rates for priority

Annual report 2014-2015

Kaponga, or Patea treatment systems on adjacent receiving waters were recorded in late summer-autumn under low flow conditions during the monitoring period (at which time the Waverley system had been desludged with bio-bugs, the Manaia system had been upgraded with the addition of two wetlands, the Kaponga pond subsurface discharge rate was very low and receiving water dilution very high) in early winter under higher flow conditions (when the Patea upgraded ponds system discharged continuously),