assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in accordance
with
page
62
Appendices
Appendix 1: Charging Policies
Resource Management Act Charging Policy
Schedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991
Schedule 1: Scale of charges for staff time
Rate for processing resource
consents and responding to pollution
incidents.
Rate for all other Council work.
Professional staff $95/hr $90/hr
Professional/supervisory staff $120/hr $112/hr
Managers $174/hr $163/hr
Support staff $95/hr $90/hr
recoverable amount. In relation to
revalued assets, the impairment loss is recognised against the revaluation reserve, for that asset
class. Where that results in a debit balance, in the revaluation reserve, the balance is recognised in
the surplus or deficit. In relation to assets that are not revalued, the total impairment is recognised
in the surplus or deficit.
page
Depreciation and amortisation expense
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis, at rates that will
at Port Taranaki during the year. One of which
involved a tallow spill from the GrainCorp Liquid Terminals NZ Ltd (GrainCorp) site within Port Taranaki,
which led to discharges of tallow and untreated wastewater into the Port Taranaki Harbour. The Council are
proceeding with a prosecution over the incident.
During the year, Downer, Technix, NZOSL and Methanex obtained a high rating for environmental and high
rating for administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents. …
Freshwater recreational bathing freshwater quality monitoring report summer 2017-2018
achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring
discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management
various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
Osflo, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative
performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with Osflo’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance
in site operations and management including the timely
holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of
methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving
sustainable development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management