Your search for 'rates' returned 2252 results.

Report 2013-2014

1.3.2 Water abstraction permit (groundwater) Section 14 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular categories set out in Section 14. The Council determined that the application to take groundwater fell within Rule 49 of the Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki (RFWP) as the rate and daily volume

Volcano hazards management for Taranaki - GNS Science

magmatic fluids in a volcano. Changes in the amount or rate of ground deformation may signal the start of a new eruptive episode. There are numerous ways to measure such deformation, like precise levelling, tilt measurement and position triangulation. Continuous Global Positioning System (CGPS) measurements provide time-series, high precision data for deformation monitoring. Satellite- based Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) is a relatively new technique for measuring ground

Biennial report 2014-2016

enables the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating

Biennial report 2013-2015

of compliance by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to the cxonsent holder’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the consent holder’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely

Schedules of charges

page 69 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Resource Management Act Charging Policy SCHEDULE OF CHARGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 36 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 SCHEDULE 1: SCALE OF CHARGES FOR STAFF TIME Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $88/hr $83/hr Professional/supervisory staff $112/hr $104/hr Managers $162/hr

Summer 2010-2011

falling within the “Alert” or “Action” categories was almost half that of the previous season. Of note, very few high counts were recorded during the 2010-2011 season. Fewer exceedances of MfE guidelines (‘Alert’ and ‘Action’) modes were coincidental with drier early season conditions and a reduction in dairy shed pond systems treated wastes discharge rates noted from field inspections during that time. One site (Waimoku Stream at Oakura beach) continued to record all of its single samples in

Quarterly Operational Report September 2020

time frame compliance has been maintained, meaning activities are not being delayed. Excellent prehearing success rate for the quarter. No appeals on decisions during the quarter. Outputs/Key performance indications PERFORMANCE MEASURE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE Provide accurate and timely information in response to all appropriate requests for assistance in implementing Regional Plan rules. Timely and appropriate information has been provided for all information …

Annual report 2016-2017

Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s

Annual report 2012-2013

re-examined the predictive flow model for the system using the existing main pond operation range and maximum pumping capacity (to the NPDC wastewater treatment plant). The secondary pond was deepened during 1999-2000 to increase the storage capacity. The predictive model indicated a much reduced likelihood of pond overflow of 3 occurrences in total over any 10 year period as a page 5 result of this increased pond capacity and higher diversion pumping rate than