assessing the impact of metals deposited on land in the vicinity of Taranaki Galvanizer’s site. The guideline for zinc is 30 kilograms per hectare per year, which equates to 8.2 mg/m2/day. This guideline is reflected in special condition 3 of consent 4064-3 which requires that the zinc deposition rate near the property boundary be less than 8.2 mg/m2/day. page 18 At both sites, deposited zinc concentrations were well within these limits (Table 4). Table 4 Taranaki
from 42% to above 70%. Notwithstanding that while NIWA confirms a definite reduction in E coli levels, the rate of compliance with NPS-FM targets has not changed over the same period5 due at least in part to the reality that peak concentrations of E. coli at peak flows are not reduced by such riparian interventions. Taking the above into account, regional gains in swimmability of some 20-25% in relative terms, from a current 39% (as modelled) to about 50%, is considered more
resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. page 3 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects
Council kerbside collections 3. Volume of household waste diverted to recycling Figure 3 shows the portion of kerbside waste that is collected for recycling for each council. The introduction of the new kerbside recycling in 2015 is evident with an increase in the portion of waste recycled, particularly in New Plymouth and Stratford. Stratford’s recycling rate is 25% which is under the target of 29% of kerbside waste being recycled by 2023, however there is a slight …
extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to
Consents & Regulatory Committee agenda September 2019
details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with STDC’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
benefits of the proposed measures, it is difficult to see how harsher or more punitive regulatory measures to reduce nutrient loadings can be justified against incremental gains that might be made.. In terms of future trends within the dairying industry, much has been made of intensification of land use (conversion to dairying or to higher stocking rates on existing pasture) within the context of the conversation around national water quality. This review notes an investigation of the issue
and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the