consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site
for the period under review included 12 site inspections
of Port Taranaki Limited, Downer New Zealand Limited and Technix Taranaki Terminal
Limited (nine routine inspections and three follow up), 11 site inspections of Methanex
Motunui Limited and ten at New Zealand Oil Services Limited. Water samples were collected
for physicochemical analysis on selected inspections.
During the two year period under review, Port Taranaki Limited obtained an ‘improvement
required’ rating in 2012-2013 and
its approach and that of consent holders
to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to
Agenda for Taranaki Regional Transport Committee 1 June 2016
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data)
development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
2013/14
Actual
2012/13
Actual
2011/12
Actual
2010/11
Actual
2009/10
Actual
2008/09
General rates $7.61m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m $7.18m $7.18m $6.85m $5.7m $5.5m
Percent change 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 1.4% 1.5% 0% 4.82% 20.2% 3.3% 2.4%
General rates to
income
28.5% 28.7% 30.0% 30.0% 30.2% 29.9% 31.6% 36.2% 31.8% 35.5% 32.1%
Rates per $100,000
capital value
$15.55 $15.55 $15.99 $16.64 $16.71 $17.18 $19.47 $17.34 $17.25 $12.96 $14.77
Total
not walking all over them and
looking after the plants that grow on them.
Table 22 State of the Environment Report – Mean annual observed coastline change
(metres/year)
Location Rate Location Rate
Waitara East -1.37 Paritutu Beach -0.45
Waitara West -0.54 Herekawe West -0.29
New Plymouth Airport -0.60 Omata -0.43
Bell Block Beach -0.32 Waireka -0.25
Waiwhakaiho East -0.31 Oakura Beach (variable) -0.20
Waiwhakaiho West -0.67 Stony River Mouth +1.53
from 42% to above 70%. Notwithstanding
that while NIWA confirms a definite reduction in E coli levels, the rate of compliance
with NPS-FM targets has not changed over the same period5 due at least in part to the
reality that peak concentrations of E. coli at peak flows are not reduced by such riparian
interventions. Taking the above into account, regional gains in swimmability of some
20-25% in relative terms, from a current 39% (as modelled) to about 50%, is considered
more