and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. page 3 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects
noted that this trend analysis is by its nature assessing trends in the percentage cover of periphyton when surveyed under conditions most conducive to the greatest proliferation, rather than in periphyton all year round. Trend analyses for periphyton were performed by applying a LOWESS fit to a time scatterplot of the percentage cover for thick mats and long filaments of periphyton. Next, the Mann-Kendall analyses test followed by Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) analyses were
Council to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their …
(KiwiRAP). KiwiRAP provides a consistent assessment of the infrastructure safety level of New Zealand roads. SH3 between New Plymouth and Waitara has a KiwiRAP rating of 2-stars. This indicates the road has limited infrastructure safety including low shoulder width, and fails to achieve the level of service required for a Regional road. This is likely to pose further safety risk for cyclists and walkers. Figure 6 displays regional KiwiRAP ratings for comparison. Figure 6: KiwiRAP
Operations and Regulatory Committee Agenda July 2023
ventilation at reducing odour emission rates by optimising ventilation, resulting in lower flowrates and a lower efflux of odour, also commensurate with lower ammonia levels as demonstrated by the chicken feet pad numbers as achieved at Midhurst and as described by Mr Whiting. 16 Mr Van Kekam6 has quoted his experience with the use air dispersion modelling to determine the peak off-site 1-hour average 99.5%ile odour concentrations (expressed as odour units per cubic metre of air
page 77 6.3 Appendix III: Examples of Taranaki Coastal Reso urces, Aerial Plans, 1987 Note: These maps have been scanned for future digitalising of the lines and erosion rate information at a high resolution. Attached are examples only. 1. Tongaporutu (#650476) 2. Whitecliffs North (#650481) 3. Mimi (#650468) 4. Urenui (#658737) (not included here) 5. Onaero (#650473) (not included here) 6. Waitara East (#658739) (not included here) 7. Waitara
resources. 1.1.3 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the
discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management