achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring …
performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of
Protect streamside vegetation by fencing it off from stock.
Plant native plants along stream edges to provide shaded habitats for
eels.
Create, protect and enhance wetlands on your property.
Encourage eel conservation and discourage over-fishing.
CONSERVATION
Longfin eel are an endemic species
and have a conservation rating of ‘at
risk, declining’.
THREATS
Threats include:
Commercial fishing.
Habitat loss and degradation.
compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such …
enables the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by Osflo, this report also
assigns them a rating for
achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring
those who don’t wear
seat belts. Recent studies show that New Zealanders have a very high rate of seat belt use in the
general population, with 95-97% of drivers and front seat passengers buckling up. Despite this, many
of those who died in crashes were found not to have been restrained.
page
NZ Transport Agency - Taranaki Regional Transport Committee Report
Page 2 of 5
In the last 5 years alone, 300 people have died because they chose not to wear a seat belt. The
species and have a conservation rating
of ‘at risk, declining’.
THREATS
Threats to this species include:
Habitat loss and degradation.
Predation, mainly by the introduced
mosquito fish.
QUICK FACTS
Brown mudfish are the largest
species of mudfish in New Zealand.
Though they are named mudfish they
much prefer clear, non-turbid waters.
They can survive around two months
out of water.
It was the first mudfish species to be
modelled water quality variables. Model predictions were evaluated
to be very good, good, satisfactory or unsatisfactory, following the criteria proposed by Moriasi
et al., 2007, outlined in Table 4.
Table 4: Performance criteria for statistics used in this study, from (Moriasi et al., 2007).
Performance Rating RSR NSE PBIAS
Very good RSR ≤ 0.50 NSE > 0.75 |PBIAS| <25
Good 0.50 < RSR ≤ 0.60 0.65 < NSE ≤ 0.75 25 ≤ |PBIAS| < 40
Satisfactory 0.60 < RSR ≤ 0.70 0.50 < NSE ≤
consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder,
this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the