Your search for 'rates' returned 2161 results.

Solid Waste Management agenda May 2020

of services, there was little or no recycling during April (Figure 2). The steady declining trend in previous months is due to the summer holiday period, as there are typically high volumes of kerbside waste and recycling in December and January compared to the rest of the year. There were four days of kerbside organics collection in April, as Level 3 was implemented towards the end of the month. During those four days, there was only a 10% presentation rate for the organic collection for …

Todd Kapuni produciton station consent monitoring 2017-2018

through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned

Stratford district landfills monitoring 2017-2018

Any investigations, interventions, and incidents for each site are discussed in subsection 3. 1.1.5 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by SDC during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving

STDC coastal structures monitoring report 2017-2018

resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each consent holder’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is

Annual report 2015-2016

the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for

Relationships between MCI, site altitude & distance from source for Taranaki ring plain streams

No. 2009-01 January 2009 where A = site altitude ( m above mean sea level). Over 62% of the variability in MCI was explained by this relationship with site altitude. This relationship indicates that MCI values of 132 ±10 at the Park boundary and 112 ±10 at the coast are the best that could reasonably be expected in ring plain streams subjected to diffuse source enrichment from agricultural activities and loss of riparian shading, and that the natural rate of change of MCI

Annual report 2014-2015

performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent