to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities
......................................................................... 30
7. Other Port Benefits ........................................................................ 35
7.1 Corporate citizen ............................................................................................................ 35
7.2 Regional rates relief and economic development outcomes ........................................... 37
7.3 Economic development opportunities ............................................................................. 37
8. Appendix
......................................................................... 30
7. Other Port Benefits ........................................................................ 35
7.1 Corporate citizen ............................................................................................................ 35
7.2 Regional rates relief and economic development outcomes ........................................... 37
7.3 Economic development opportunities ............................................................................. 37
8. Appendix
the source of the incident (or that
the allegation cannot be proven).
page
3
Any investigations, interventions, and incidents for each site are discussed in
subsection 3.
Evaluation of environmental performance 1.1.5
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by SDC during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to the
Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental
Nitrogen (DIN) limits alone would cost $100,000 a year for 33% of the region’s
dairy farms and $50,000 for 70%.
In its submission, the Council asked why the Government wanted to harm the industry in
this way, when Taranaki’s mountain-fed rivers are rated in the ‘A’ and ‘B’ bands for
ecological health by the Government’s own measure. Their ecological health has, with only
rare exception, been stable or improving for a decade or more.
The Government last week announced policy work would …
Policy & Planning Committee agenda October 2020
confirms that subject to
recommendation 7 below, the preferred option is option 2
to raise up to $55m to repair the stands and upgrade associated facilities, noting
that the proposed facilities upgrades will be implemented in a prioritised
manner to the extent of the available budget
to repay the up to $55m of borrowing over 25 years
page
Minutes Ordinary Meeting Tuesday 26 February 2019
to establish single purpose Yarrow Stadium fixed charge targeted rates
implementation of riparian management and improved stream health
and reduced E coli levels; the lack of correlation between increasing riparian
interventions and any evidence of a change in attainment of the NPS-FM
swimmability criteria; the very high rate of attainment of swimmability in Taranaki
if assessed against EU criteria instead of NPS-FM criteria; and the absence of any
correlation between nutrient trends and macroinvertebrate community health
trends
4. notes the report’s findings
Refer sections in this
Strategy:
METH 1 Identify and monitor regionally significant natural areas, waterways,
wetlands, and other areas with significant or outstanding indigenous
biodiversity values.
6.5.3
METH 2 Monitor and gather information on potential fish barriers and promote
their removal.
6.3.7;6.5.3
METH 3 Consider the use of financial incentives, such as grants, subsidies and
rate relief, to promote the maintenance and enhancement of indigenous
biodiversity
Policy & Planning Committee agenda October 2018