Your search for 'rates' returned 2174 results.

Sustainable land use

information on the riparian planting programme (see Chapter 3—Fresh water, page 84). Information, education and advice Each year the Council receives and responds to numerous requests from the public for information on sustainable land management relating to vegetation clearance, native logging, the implementation rate of the Sustainable Land Management and Riparian Land Management programmes, aerial photography, planting advice and new property plan enquiries. In 2013/2014, the

Further information - Ōpunake Power Ltd

that with the proposed abstraction rate of 3.9 cumecs, the scheme has the potential to ‘flatline’ the lower river, even under scenario 2. An example of this is shown in Figure 3, where the smaller variations in flow can be completely absorbed by the station. Jowett states in his report that the impacts of low flows begin to manifest after 30 days. The synthetic natural flow record shows that this occurs most years (Figure 5, Table 5). Although scenario 2 (no abstraction when flows are in excess

STDC landfills monitoring 2020-2021

1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the STDC’s approach

Concrete plants consent monitoring report 2018-2019

and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative

10AEE AppendixH

bore permeability tests on the monitoring bores GND 2188 and GND 2190 (January 8th 2015). The 'slug test' method requires removal of a set amount of water, where after recovery of water levels is timed with a stopwatch. The four litre 'slug' was removed by a high rate vacuum pump, and the recovering water level was determined with a calibrated electronic dip tape. Both monitoring bores did not fully recover to their initial water levels after 100 minutes. GND 2188 recorded sudden surges in water

Report and decision on a poultry farming operation (2011)

weekend [Saturdays and Sundays]. 10. The discharges authorised by this consent shall not give rise to suspended or deposited dust at or beyond the boundary of the site that, in the opinion of at least one enforcement officer of the Taranaki Regional Council, is offensive or objectionable. For the purpose of this condition, discharges in excess of the following limits are deemed to be offensive or objectionable: a) dust deposition rate 0.13 g/m2/day; and/or b) suspended dust level 3

Central Landfill baseline monitoring 2018-2019

is to provide some continuity and an indication of the further work required should the project proceed. page No rating is given for environmental and administrative performance as the project was on hold for the year under review. For reference, in the 2018-2019 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental performance and compliance for 83% of the consents monitored through the Taranaki tailored monitoring programmes, while for another

Annual report 2015-2016

utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. Evaluation of environmental performance 1.1.4 Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the

Annual report 2014-2015

during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency