administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent
responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
inspections programmed for the 2020-2021 period, but
hydrological monitoring was undertaken by maintaining the McColl’s Bridge flow recorder.
The monitoring showed that overall the scheme operated within resource consent requirements for the vast
majority of the period being reported. During this period, the Company was fully compliant with lake levels
and the rise and recession rate restrictions for the lower Patea River. The Company provided adequate
residual flows within the Patea River at all
Operations and Regulatory Committee Agenda April 2023
Regional Software Holdings Ltd Statement of Intent 2023 - 2025
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to
Consent 0231-4 12
Table 3 Summary of performance for Consent 5453-2 14
Table 4 Summary of performance for Consent 10314-1 14
List of figures
Figure 1 Oaonui Water Supply Ltd’s water service area 4
Figure 2 Seven-day volume (consent limit 28,000 m3) 7
Figure 3 Daily abstraction rate (consent limit 50 L/s) 7
Figure 4 Macroinvertebrate index results recorded in the Oaonui Stream in relation to the OWSL
Stream Weir, December 2020 9
Figure 5 Macroinvertebrate index
monitoring, enables the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each
contaminants to air and maintaining the high overall standard of air quality
• Managing the allocation of the region’s water resources.
page
22
Financial Trends
Actual
2020/21
Budget
2020/21
Actual
2019/20
Actual
2018/19
Actual
2017/18
Actual
2016/17
Actual
2015/16
Actual
2014/15
Actual
2013/14
Actual
2012/13
Actual
2011/12
General rates $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m $7.18m $7.18m
Percent change 0% 0%
required to enter three incidents in relation to
irrigation consents over this period, which resulted in two infringement notices being issued. The overall
rate of non-compliance across all exercised consents was 5%, which was similar to that seen during the
2019-2020 period (4%).
During the 2020-2021 year, 84% of exercised irrigation consents in Taranaki achieved a high level of
environmental performance and compliance with their consents, 11% achieved a good level of performance,
while 5%