the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the
assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
appendix 2.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the consents monitored through the Taranaki tailored
… region to present a coherent and united case to the Government for funding
for specific projects to assist with the recovery from COVID-19. And we are committing funds to the refurbishment of our
Stratford office, which is no longer fit for purpose.
We will also be conducting one of our regular formal reviews of our 100% ownership of Port Taranaki Ltd, with more
public consultation if changes are proposed as a result.
Budgeting for a rates increase is never a decision taken lightly.
inspections programmed for the 2020-2021 period, but
hydrological monitoring was undertaken by maintaining the McColl’s Bridge flow recorder.
The monitoring showed that overall the scheme operated within resource consent requirements for the vast
majority of the period being reported. During this period, the Company was fully compliant with lake levels
and the rise and recession rate restrictions for the lower Patea River. The Company provided adequate
residual flows within the Patea River at all
Executive, Audit and Risk Committee Minutes 28
5. June 2021 Meeting Dates 32
6. Draft Submission on "Phasing Out Fossil Fuels in Process Heat" Consultation Paper 33
7. Adoption of the 2021/2031 Long-Term Plan 51
8. Setting of Rates 2021/2022 246
9. Representation Review: Timetable and Process 253
10. Public Excluded 256
11. Public Excluded Consents and Regulatory Minutes 257
12. Public Excluded Executive, Audit and Risk Committee Minutes 260
Ordinary Meeting - Agenda
2
various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental
and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
the Stratford Power Station continued to be well managed with negligible
environmental effects as a process of the exercise of their consents.
Surface water abstraction was compliant with daily rate and volume. Process water discharges were
compliant with consent defined parameters. Surface water monitoring indicated negligible impacts from the
discharge of process waters.
The thermal tolerances within the receiving waters were not exceeded for the duration of the monitoring
period.
utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and
its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and
closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The