flared d) Imposition of limits on or relating to discharge or ambient concentrations of contaminants, or on or relating to mass discharge rates e) Best practicable option to prevent or minimise any adverse effects on the environment f) Location of any facilities or equipment for hydrocarbon flaring in relation to surrounding land uses g) Separation of natural gas from liquid hydrocarbons and water h) Notification of flaring to neighbours, affected parties, and the Council
drift enters surface water; d) The discharge does not occur at a rate at which it cannot be assimilated by the soil/pasture system; and e) The pasture cover within irrigation areas is maintained at all times. e Condition 10 treated wastewater discharged by irrigation to land shall not have a hydrocarbon content exceeding 5% total petroleum hydrocarbon or a sodium adsorption ratio exceeding 18. Condition 11 Discharges irrigated to land shall not give rise to any of the following
assessment of the abstraction and discharge data provided by NPDC. The monitoring showed that overall the NPDC water schemes are well operated and maintained and appeared to be having no adverse effects on the environment. NPDC provided all the abstraction data required under consent conditions and the data showed that all daily volume limits and instantaneous abstraction rates were complied with. Self-monitoring of the Inglewood discharge showed minor non-compliances with suspended solids
to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, the report also assigns it a rating for its environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment form the activities during the
_________________________________________________________________________________ 3.4. Map Co-ordinates at point of activity (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM) ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.5. Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice) _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.6. Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to
________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice) _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
(refer to land title or rates notice) ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.6 What is the name of the river or stream where the activity is
_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.3 Map Co-ordinates at point of structure (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
land use 1996 – 2008 and 2008 - 2020 (Source PCE, 2013) Period Sheep and Beef Dairy Plantation Forestry Scrub 1996 – 2008 7,600 -11,800 4,700 -500 2008 – 2020 -32,000 17,700 14,900 -600 For the purposes of this exercise the trend rate from 2008 – 2014 is used and it is assumed this is replicated over the following 10 years to 2025. This would give an annual increase in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 162000 164000 166000 168000
also assigns a rating as to STDC’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the organisation’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water