survey sites 13 Table 6 Summary of biomonitoring results for the Kurapete Stream in relation to the Company’s quarry from March 1997 to March 2016 13 Table 7 Results from follow up sample collected on 21 June 2016 14 Table 8 Example Summary of performance for consent 1113-4 18 List of figures Figure 1 Quarry operations, wastewater treatment system 6 Figure 2 Aerial location map showing sampling sites’ locations in relation to the quarry site. 7 List of photos
operations, wastewater treatment system and location of sampling sites 6 Figure 2 Aerial location map showing sampling sites’ locations in relation to the quarry site. 7 List of photos Photos 1 & 2 Recent progress with re-instatement, February, 2015 13 page 1 Introduction 1. 1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource Management Act 1991 1.1.1 Introduction This report is the annual report for the period July 2014-June 2015 by the
Summary of performance for consent 1113-4 for discharge of treated quarry groundwater, stormwater and washwater to a tributary of the Kurapete Stream 17 List of figures Figure 1 Quarry operations, wastewater treatment system and location of sampling sites 4 Figure 2 Aerial location map showing sampling sites’ locations 5 page 1 Introduction 1. 1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource Management Act 1991 1.1.1 Introduction
units (17 per cent). A small proportion of respondents lived on farmlets or lifestyle blocks (12 per cent) bordering the city. 4.2 Involvement with trapping and reducing rat numbers Respondents were mapped into the I3 Response Framework (see Fig. 2) based on their involvement with reducing rat numbers and with trapping. A score of one indicates the minimum possible level of involvement, and a score of five indicates the highest possible level of involvement.2 Statistical
monitoring from the Hickman JD Family Trust site 7 Table 3 Results of receiving environment monitoring in relation to the Trust’s site 8 Table 4 Incidents, investigations, and interventions summary table 10 Table 5 Example Summary of performance for consent 1281-3, up to 15 Nov 2018 11 Table 6 Example Summary of performance for consent 1281-4, from 16 Nov 2018 12 Table 7 Evaluation of environmental performance over time 13 List of figures Figure 1 Aerial location map of
Increases in land value is mainly related to the proximity of properties to specific amenities such as the beach, sea views or the city centre, as shown in the map below. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 19 95 19 98 20 01 20 04 20 07 20 10 20 13 20 16 Hastings District New Plymouth page New Plymouth District Council 12 of 33 Indicator 4: Number of residential building consents Source: Statistics NZ (InfoShare),
Limited. In particular, Dr Buckland contributed to appendices on background information on dioxins, historical soil investigations and international soil guidelines. Taranaki Regional Council (Brian Calkin and Gary Bedford) assisted with the site selection process by carrying out preliminary site inspections and interviewing owners. New Plymouth District Council (René Laan) assisted with providing aerial photographs and mapping information. Initial drafts of this report were
concrete bund had been added around the diesel tank filling area as an extra method of containment for potential spills. The yard was clean, tidy and well maintained during the time of inspections. 2.1.2 Results of physicochemical discharge and receiving water monitoring Sampling locations are described in Table 2 and indicated on the map in Figure 2. Table 2 Locations and details of sampling sites Site Location GPS coordinates Site code Western discharge Untreated stormwater
Theil-Sen long term trend analysis 22 Figure 19 Theil-Sen trend analysis by wind direction 22 Figure 20 ScEM analysis of the EBAM filter from 4th July 2016 27 Figure 21 ScEM analysis of the EBAM filter from 24thth July 2016 28 Figure 22 Covid-19 lockdown PM2.5 levels 31 Figure 23 Comparison of covid-19 lockdown levels with previous years 31 Figure 24 Map of commercial and industrial air emission consents, for the 2016-2019 period 59 Figure 25 Diurnal variation in PM2.5 …
located around the edge of Beatrix Bay. Backbones (surface structures) on the 37 marine farms span approximately 8.5 km (33%) of total shoreline length at sea level (but more under water). Approximately 85% of the surface area (2,000 ha) of Beatrix Bay is not occupied by mussel farms. [10] At the hearing, a map was produced showing Beatrix Bay and the King Shag foraging in detail. It illustrates the necklace arrangement of the granted marine farms, together with the dates of the grant of those