between inlet works and screenings building blocked up with rags causing wastewater discharge. N No Blockage cleared, site cleaned and sanitised. Procedures updated to prevent reoccurrence. 22 August 2022 Heavy rainfall caused high flows at the inlet works overwhelming band screens N No Problem resolved as rain eased and inflows reduced. 22 August 2022 High rainfall caused Clarifier 3 to overwash. N No Overwash stopped as rain eased. 26
base to ensure that we are acting in the most effective ways. Collective Responsibility He waka eke noa – We are all in this together - we rise together, fall together, work together, keep going together. • We recognize and respect that there is a shared responsibility across the 4 Rs at all levels (nationally, regionally, locally, and community levels) and ensure roles and responsibilities are defined and understood. • We empower and enable community-level response, and ensure it is
site. The consent (7645-1) is held by Alby M Limited, and compliance monitoring of consent 7645-1 is not included in this report page 6 Results 2.2.1 Inspections 21 September 2022 It was raining with a light breeze at the time of the inspection. The cap was in good condition and was showing no signs of slumping. There was some ponding present, but the inspection was during a rain event, thus this would be expected. There was evidence of good stock rotation and
rain had caused overflow to the Kurapete Stream. The discharge had no significant visual effect downstream in the receiving waters. Samples were collected of the discharge, upstream and two sites downstream. 11 May 2022 The primary screen was operating and wastes were fully contained. The pond level had been lowered in the primary lagoon to allow a survey to be carried out around the wave band perimeter (remedial works are planned during the 22/23 summer). The pond was turbid and
however the bung was missing allowing rainwater and possibly contaminants to discharge onto the ground. One solution would be to place an oliophillic mat below the pump to capture any hydrocarbon while allowing rainwater to drain, this was discussed with staff at the time of the inspection. Also discussed was the purposed and use of plastic matting under the rig. For some areas plastic matting is suitable, however for others the matting needs to be used to capture solid/liquid that falls from the
Council (Red lines show council boundaries). page GNS Science Consultancy Report 2015/172 3 Table 1 Average recurrence intervals (ARI) and 48-hr rainfalls for selected rainfall monitoring sites in the Taranaki Regional Council area. Rainfall monitoring sites 48 hr rainfall (mm) ARI (yrs) North Egmont at Visitor's Centre 456 7 Dawson Falls 531.5 15 Kahui Hut 366 8 Mangorei at Reservoir 175.5 7 Hillsborough 187.5
landfill at Victoria Rd Figure 2 Stratford landfill (shaded in yellow) and sampling locations 2.1 Inspections 27 August 2012 A site visit was made to conduct a compliance monitoring inspection and to take groundwater samples. The weather was fine with 12 mm rain over the previous 24 hours. Large areas of the crown of cap had been sown with grass. The re-grassed area had been fenced off from stock. There were some areas of ponding around the stock troughs and on the
MANAIA HAWERA EGMONT NATIONAL PARK Total winter rainfall (mm) KEY % of average winter rainfall xxx yy% INGLEWOOD Pohokura Saddle Dawson Falls Cape Egmont Stratford Whareroa Patea North Egmont Inglewood Motunui Mangorei Kaka Rd Kotare Rimunui Glenn Rd Huinga 157% 149% 147% 107% 137%149% 167% 167% 153% 134% 143% 523 N/A 899 977 798 2245 2723 452 487 404 582 567 728 128%
$450.00 per day Calibration test equipment hire $100.00 per hour Disposabale bailer $20.00 per sample Peristaltic pump $100.00 per day Rain gauge calibration $300.00 per deployment Automatic water quality samplers $50.00 per day Repair parts (battery/fuse/cable) $50.00 per deployment Betrand Rd telemetry $2,000.00 per year GPRS telemetry $30.00 per month Lake Rotorangi telemetry $1,752.00 per year Mangati Stream telemetry $2,900.00 per year Mangawhero
in the skimmer pit under hot, sunny and dry conditions, rather than any chemical source. The water level in the pit was very low at the time of inspection. It was considered by Council officers that should enough rain fall to cause a discharge, the pH would fall to well within consent limits prior to any discharge occurring. No remedial action was required by the Council. Also on 14 November 2012, a sample taken from the skimmer pit showed an elevated suspended solids concentration. It