population growth district. This assessment will be
reviewed in December 2018.
Housing: In general all the indicators in this group have increased with the exception of the
housing affordability measure, which has improved. This leads us to believe that while the cost
of building or buying a first home in New Plymouth has increased, it is less than the rate of
affordability1.
Rent has continued to increase but the rate of change has decreased, therefore renting has
become
categorised, 2 were rated ‘poor’, 1 was rated
‘improvement required’, 2 were rated ‘good’ and 14 ‘high’. During the year under review
there were eight incidents associated with the Whareroa site (five incidents linked with milk
spills requiring disposal of product via the marine outfall, two incidents involving
stormwater pond non-compliances and one incident requiring the disposal of milk permeate
to land). One Infringement Notice was issued during the 2012-2013 period relating to non-
compliant
any discharge of waste material to the
‘collection pond’, or to the material stockpiled on Pad 3.
Under no circumstances must there be any discharge of waste material to the
‘collection pond’, or to the material stockpiled on Pad 3.
Incorporated into condition 12 above
Irrigation
14 From a date no later than 60 days after these consents commencing, the consent
holder must measure and record the rate and volume of discharge from the
Irrigation Pond at
housing affordability and housing development. The report also includes information on business land
and floor space.
Summary of findings:
We are expected to be a medium-high population growth district.
Residential Indicator Group 1: In general all the indicators in this group have increased with the
exception of the housing affordability measure. This leads us to believe that while the cost of
building or buying your first home has increased, it is less than the rate of
myrtle species.
page
Recount June 2017 Page 3
Historic occasion
heralds new future
Regional rates will remain virtually
unchanged under the 2017/2018 Annual
Plan adopted by the Taranaki Regional
Council.
“It’s pleasing that we will remain one of the
lowest-rating Councils in New Zealand,”
says the Council Chairman, David
MacLeod. “Our focus remains firmly on
ensuring our programmes and operations
are efficient and effective and of value to
the community,
for servicing the liability, with the aim of
avoiding the use of rate income.”
The story now: The inherited debt was largely
paid off by 1997, when the Council received
its first cash dividend from the port. Dividends
have since offset rates requirements, and the
Council also operates a dividend equalisation
fund, in which any dividends surplus to budget
are kept for when dividends are below budget.
Port Taranaki Ltd, meanwhile, reported its
highest-ever
Executive, Audit & Risk Committee agenda October 2020
Waiwhakaiho, were the two most popular
river sites across the survey. Meanwhile, lake sites such as Lake Rotokare, Rotorangi and Ratapiko remain
popular for particular activities, including boating, jet skiing and camping.
Access to water recreational sites across the region was deemed to be relatively good, with 87% of
questionnaire respondents saying they had been able to access the sites they wanted, and 85% rating
overall levels of access as being good or excellent. The main factor determining …
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site
performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the Contact Energy’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance