additional feedback. The second submission is also included in
Appendix 2 and the officers report on their additional feedback follows
below.
5 Application for authority
Oppose Decline/no relief required
The submitter opposes the need to pay fees associated with applying for an
authority under the bylaws for the following reasons:
• The fees and charges associated with applying for multiple
authorities could potentially impose significant costs on the rate
paying community and
improvement in the Trust’s environmental and administrative performance is required. During the year
under review inadequate maintenance of the treatment systems on the discharges resulted in a breach of
the suspended solids limit on the consent. The unauthorised discharges caused a conspicuous change in the
visual clarity of the tributary below the site. An abatement notice was issued and re-inspection found that
the abatement notice had been complied with. Ratings are as defined in Section 1.1.4.
gardening books, and these will soon be
available to borrow through an on-line catalogue
Note, the Members Lounge and Boardroom are kept locked with access via a keypad. The pin number
for the keypad changes annually. The number will be sent to you along with your member’s card.
• Discounts when hiring the Studio or booking events at the Lodge. For new members, this discounted
rate is available after six months.
• Volunteering in the garden and during public events.
• Full voting
consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
page
62
Appendices
Appendix 1: Charging Policies
Resource Management Act Charging Policy
Schedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991
Schedule 1: Scale of charges for staff time
Rate for processing resource
consents and responding to pollution
incidents.
Rate for all other Council work.
Professional staff $95/hr $90/hr
Professional/supervisory staff $120/hr $112/hr
Managers $174/hr $163/hr
Support staff $95/hr $90/hr
of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to
resources.
1.1.3 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the
high rating for environmental and high
rating for administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents. Port Taranaki’s
environmental performance and compliance required improvement, however their administrative
performance and compliance was high.
For reference, in the 2018-2019 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 83% of the consents monitored through the Taranaki tailored monitoring
programmes, while for
resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the
assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in accordance
with