Your search for 'rates' returned 2207 results.

Annual report 2015-2016

a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in

Quarterly Operational Report December 2017

performance may not be achieved: Nil. The following performance measures are noted as being red. That is, performance to date has not achieved the target or the performance for the rest of the year is unlikely to achieve the target: Investment management: The Council’s Investment Policy has a 6% target for interest returns. The Local Government Act 2002 requires the Council to set a target. In the current interest rate environment, the Council is unlikely to reach

Annual report 2016-2017

through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with

Quarterly Operational Report March 2017

single programme), together with additional programmes for hydrocarbon exploration and development activities. Consent holders have been assessed on environmental performance and on consent compliance. The ratings for these consent holders were found to be 71% ‘high’ and 24% ‘good’. By the end of March 2017, all reports for 2016/2017 had been completed. A similar number of specific monitoring programmes are being delivered in 2016/2017. The farm dairy effluent monitoring programme

Annual report 2015-2016

holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under

Site 82

field of science for many people. The programmes undertaken are extremely wide-ranging and include national bird counts, water quality measurement, pest free programmes, wetland restoration, intertidal diversity studies and lizard monitoring. I expect schools to hear more about and have greater involvement with citizen science in the next few years. Building developments are progressing at a fast rate at Pukeiti with the official opening expected in

Rules applying to open coast

Administrative charges 1.1(d), 2.1, 2.3, 5.4, 9.3, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7 Discharge of petroleum dispersants into water or onto land in the coastal marine area C2.4 • Dispersant is used in the event of a marine oil spill; • Discharge is of a dispersant of petroleum approved for use in marine oil spills by the Maritime Safety Authority; • Dispersant is applied at the rates and by the methods recommended by the manufacturer; Permitted page 8 •

C D Boyd Drilling Waste and Stockpiling Landfarm and Landspreading Annual Report 2020-2021

resources. 1.1.3 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the

Agenda

follow.  The current Cost Benefit Ratio has 10+ ratings whereas the new two stage process has four.  A new Very High rating has been introduced.  Consultation is open until 21 April 2017. FR will draft a regional submission for the RTAG to review via email. DCs indicated that they are unlikely to submit separately at an organisational level.  The draft IAF for PT will be released on 27 April 2017. Long Term Strategic View (LTSV) WW introduced the LTSV, with key