Your search for 'rates' returned 2252 results.

Policy & Planning agenda April 2018

problem • We have used t-tests to determine whether two percentages are different from each other. With each t-test that is done, we incur a probability of a Type I error (rejection of a true null hypothesis or in other words ‘false positive’). The probability of committing a Type I error is the significance level of the test, which is set to 5%. When doing multiple tests, the Type I error rate is inflated. We have used the false discovery rate (FDR) method to control the expected proportion

Port Taranaki industries consent monitoring 2019-2020

at Port Taranaki during the year. One of which involved a tallow spill from the GrainCorp Liquid Terminals NZ Ltd (GrainCorp) site within Port Taranaki, which led to discharges of tallow and untreated wastewater into the Port Taranaki Harbour. The Council are proceeding with a prosecution over the incident. During the year, Downer, Technix, NZOSL and Methanex obtained a high rating for environmental and high rating for administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents. …

Compliance, monitoring and enforcement metrics 2017-2018

compliance, monitoring and enforcement metrics for the regional sector | Managing the workload 13-15, 18 * Councils collectively receive 29143 complaints, of which 25,314 (87%) are responded to, (33% in person, the rest via other means). * Councils report relatively low rates of complaint verification (as low as 17%) which may be driven by a range of reasons * Councils administered a total of more than 200,000 active resource consents for the reporting year, of

Agenda

Agenda for Ordinary Council meeting September 2017.

Annual report 2016-2017

enables the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for

Agenda

Services, spoke to the memorandum to receive, consider and adopt the Council’s 2017/2018 Annual Plan – Statement of Proposal, the consultation document for the 2017/2018 Annual Plan – Statement of Proposal, for public consultation, and the 2017/2018 estimates. 6.2 The key points in the 2017/2018 Annual Plan – Statement of Proposal were highlighted to the Council, being:  A 1% general rates increase against a proposed increase of 0.5% for 2017/2018 in the 2015/2025 Long-Term Plan

Annual report 2015-2016

consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such

Annual report 2012-2013

isolation valves have been installed on the disposal lines for use should it be necessary to remove the disposal line valves for maintenance. An accessible sampling site has been constructed at the end of the disposal trenches. STDC reported that a sludge survey of the oxidation pond (in January 2006) indicated that at the current rate of accumulation, sludge removal would not be required for another 11 years. An updated Management Plan (July 2007) was supplied by the consent holder for the

Annual report 2013-2014

both environmental and administrative performance and compliance with resource consents 6135-1 and 5325-1, and a good level of administrative compliance for consent 5935-1. There was one incident recorded by the Council in relation to the Company’s landfarming operations at the Spence Road site under consent 5935-1. This incident was operational rather than environmental in nature, and has been dealt with effectively by the Company, but affects their overall compliance rating for that