holders
to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under
a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in
During the period under review, Port Taranaki Ltd obtained a ‘high’ rating for environmental
and administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents.
Suspended solids remained well below consent limits it all samples analysed. There were no
recorded incidents. The environmental performance of Port Taranaki Ltd has continued to
improve from previous years.
During the same period, Downer New Zealand Ltd, Technix Taranaki Terminal Ltd,
Methanex New Zealand and New Zealand Oil
regions resources.
Evaluation of environmental performance 1.1.4
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is
job to be completed before there is more land erosion, and to avoid costs of temporary
measures. Seeks for the wall to be finished with no conditions.
Ian Noel Bullock Support N To ensure the foreshore camping and recreational facilities can be kept safe and intact for the future
Ian Parker Support N Completion of the wall as soon as possible to stop erosion.
Jason Quickenden Support N Installation of rock wall to stop erosion of Urenui Beach. It is costing rate payers money to try and
observable and/or ongoing effects upon soil and groundwater quality associated
with the land disposal process
• effective incorporation of material, application rates and associated earthworks
• integrity and management of storage facilities
• dust and odour effects in proximity of the site boundaries
• housekeeping and site management
• the neighbourhood was surveyed for environmental effects.
1.5.4 Chemical sampling
During the monitoring period the Council collected six composite
follow.
The current Cost Benefit Ratio has 10+ ratings whereas the new two stage
process has four.
A new Very High rating has been introduced.
Consultation is open until 21 April 2017. FR will draft a regional submission for
the RTAG to review via email. DCs indicated that they are unlikely to submit
separately at an organisational level.
The draft IAF for PT will be released on 27 April 2017.
Long Term Strategic View (LTSV)
WW introduced the LTSV, with key
re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative
ecology
inspection. The Company carried out air emission sampling and groundwater monitoring
through independent consultants and further storm water sampling, and forwarded the
results to the Council for audit and review.
Processing rates continued to increase during the period, particularly for herbicides.
The monitoring showed that the Company has had no significant impact on air quality in the
vicinity of the plant or on water quality in the Herekawe Stream. No complaint about odour
was