the
nature and extent of such measures remains, of
necessity, a matter for regional council/community to
determine under the LGA processes.
Of note regional councils may also use section 85 of
the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 to provide for
rates remission for land that has high biodiversity value
where they have a policy to do so under section 109 of
the same Act.
2.3 Other agencies’ statutory
mandate
A large number of agencies and groups
undertaking successful enforcement
action.
Commentary/Highlights
Consent holders are assessed each year on their environmental performance and on consent compliance. The performance is
publicly reported. Overall ratings for consent holders in the 2018/2019 year were found to be 83% ‘high’ and 13% ‘good’.
Reporting of the 2017/2018 programmes was completed, with the final suite of annual reports presented to Council in April
2019. Ninety-seven annual reports together with four
Meeting - Confirmation of Minutes
6
page
Minutes Ordinary Meeting Tuesday 26 February 2019
to establish single purpose Yarrow Stadium fixed charge targeted rates in
accordance with the Council’s Revenue and Financing Policy.
7. in respect to Yarrow Stadium, agrees that additional alternative sources of funding
continue to be explored and that if, by 31 December 2020, such funding has been
sourced to enable the completion of option 4, at no additional cost to the
enables the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with WRS’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in
to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of
consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of
methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving
sustainable development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their
incorporation of material, application rates and associated earthworks
• integrity and management of storage facilities
• dust and odour effects in proximity of the site boundaries
• housekeeping and site management
• the neighbourhood was surveyed for environmental effects.
page
8
1.5.4 Chemical sampling
During the monitoring period the Council collected six composite soil samples from the
Vanner site. The samples were analysed for chloride, conductivity, hydrocarbons,
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely
consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating