utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the
in redox
conditions occurred within the aquifer over this period. While the exact cause of this
change remains unclear, it may be related to changes in abstraction rates from the
bore over the corresponding period. The concentrations of all analytes had returned
to ‘typical’ values for this site by the end of the monitoring period.
The trends identified at shallow sampling sites appear to be driven by a wider range
of processes than those at deeper sites. At site GND0827, the
the following regional
councils: Auckland Regional Council, Environment Canterbury, Horizons, Northland,
Wellington, Otago, Hawkes Bay and Environment Waikato.
Several of these councils have key performance indicators (KPIs) that set targets for customer
satisfaction, e.g. ARC – ‘At least 75% of customers are satisfied with the resource consent
process’, Greater Wellington – ‘60% of recent applicants and existing consent holders rate
level of satisfaction as excellent or very good’.
Of
parameters
monthly at 77 river sites around New Zealand (Smith, et al, 1989). The programme
includes three sites in Taranaki (Figure 1); one upper/mid catchment site (Manganui
River at State Highway 3, incorporating some farm land area) and two lower
catchment sites (Waitara River at Bertrand Road and Waingongoro River at State
Highway 45).
Using data collected in the NWQN since 1989, NIWA scientists have analysed trends
over time for a number of parameters at the Taranaki sites and have rated
have analysed trends
over time for a number of parameters at the Taranaki sites and have rated them
relative to other New Zealand rivers (McBride, 1996, TRC, 2003 and TRC, 2009).
Water quality has been relatively stable at the Waitara River site compared with
national trends and, not surprisingly, water quality remains high at the upper/mid
catchment Manganui River site. A deterioration in aspects of water quality has
occurred at the site in the lower reaches of the Waingongoro River over
State Highway 3, incorporating some farm land area) and two lower
catchment sites (Waitara River at Bertrand Road and Waingongoro River at State
Highway 45).
Using data collected in the NWQN since 1989, NIWA scientists have analysed trends
over time for a number of parameters at the Taranaki sites and have rated them
relative to other New Zealand rivers (McBride, 1996, TRC, 2003 and TRC, 2009).
Water quality has been relatively stable at the Waitara River site compared with
national trends
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental
(reported) minor injuries or damage only crashes.
The KiwiRap Taranaki Regional Results 2012 give SH43 a low collective risk rating (average annual fatal
and serious crashes per km) and a high personal risk rating (average annual fatal and serious crashes per
100 million vehicle-km) for the period 2007-2011.
Table 2.1 SH43
Traffic Volumes
2011 to 2015
page
Our Ref: Issue Date: 6
State Highway 43 Investigation
Final v5.docx
25 July 2017
2.3
refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual
of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the
timely provision of