excelsa), Miro (Prumnopitys ferruginea) and
Matai (Prumnopitys taxifolia) and is generally in good condition. The
understorey and ground cover is in good condition and is made up of a wide
number of shrub species including Kawakawa (Piper excelsum), Kanono
(Coprosma grandifolia), and Coprosma areolata along with a wide range of
ferns. Also of note is a small area containing Swamp maire (Syzygium
maire) and the fern Deparia petersenii subsp. congrua (both rated
Regionally Distinctive).
be abstracted for
washing at quarries fit within the permitted activity rule [Rule 15] of the Regional
Fresh Water Plan for Taranaki. That is, the abstraction volume shall not exceed 50 cubic
metres per day, and the abstraction rate shall not exceed 1.5 litres per second.
1.4.2 Water discharge permit
Section 15(1)(a) of the RMA stipulates that no person may discharge any contaminant
into water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in
a
(RFWP) for Taranaki.
Graham Harris (2000) Limited holds no water abstraction permit. The water volume
and abstraction rate required to service the Company’s operations are less than 50
cubic metres per day and 1.5 litres per second respectively, therefore the activity is
permitted under Rule 15 of the RFWP.
Water discharge permit 1.4.2
Section 15(1)(a) of the Resource Management Act stipulates that no person may
discharge any contaminant into water, unless the activity is
refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or …
performance and extent of compliance by
STOS, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative
performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with STOS’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance
in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to
development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
of the performance and extent of compliance by
the NPDC during the period under review, this report also assigns them a rating for
their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the consent holder’s approach to demonstrating
consent compliance in site operations
review, this report also assigns a
rating as to NPDC’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the consent holder’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the
timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take
Quarterly Operational Report December 2021
consideration (from the IMO
guidelines):
"The decision to allow an offshore installation, structure, or parts thereof, to remain on
the sea-bed should be based, in particular, on a case-by-case evaluation, by the coastal
State with jurisdiction over the installation or structure, of the following matters:
.1 any potential effect on the safety of surface or subsurface navigation, or of other uses
of the sea;
.2 the rate of deterioration of the material and its present and possible