Your search for 'rates' returned 2231 results.

FRODO 669559 v31 Application form Discharge contaminants to water or land incl CMA

_________________________________________________________________________________ 3.4 Map Co-ordinates at point of discharge (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice) _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.6 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer

TRC Annual Report 2020/2021

contaminants to air and maintaining the high overall standard of air quality • Managing the allocation of the region’s water resources. page 22 Financial Trends Actual 2020/21 Budget 2020/21 Actual 2019/20 Actual 2018/19 Actual 2017/18 Actual 2016/17 Actual 2015/16 Actual 2014/15 Actual 2013/14 Actual 2012/13 Actual 2011/12 General rates $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m $7.18m $7.18m Percent change 0% 0%

Climate change projections and impacts for Taranaki May 2022

mean sea level pressure over the Southwest Pacific, 1981-2010. 96 Figure 4-1: Relative SLR rates up to and including 2019 (excluding Whangarei), determined from longer sea-level gauge records at the four main ports (Auckland, Wellington, Lyttelton, Dunedin) and shorter records from the remaining sites. 99 Figure 4-2: Map of regional trend in SLR from 1993 to 1 September 2020 based on satellite altimetry missions. 99 Figure 4-3: Average vertical land movement for near-coastal

Groundwater Quality State of the Environment Monitoring 2015-2020

Trend analysis has been carried out using the LWP-Trends library R package (version 1901), developed by Land Water People Ltd. (Snelder and Fraser, 2019). The methods employed have the primary purpose of establishing the direction and rate of any trend, along with a measure of the uncertainty in the result. Trend analysis is undertaken using the last 10 years of monitoring data (1 July 2010 to 30 June 2020) when the following criteria have been satisfied: • There is at least 75% data …

NPDC Inglewood WWTP Annual Report 2021-2022

management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are

Oaonui Water Supply Ltd Monitoring Programme Annual Report 2020-2021

Consent 0231-4 12 Table 3 Summary of performance for Consent 5453-2 14 Table 4 Summary of performance for Consent 10314-1 14 List of figures Figure 1 Oaonui Water Supply Ltd’s water service area 4 Figure 2 Seven-day volume (consent limit 28,000 m3) 7 Figure 3 Daily abstraction rate (consent limit 50 L/s) 7 Figure 4 Macroinvertebrate index results recorded in the Oaonui Stream in relation to the OWSL Stream Weir, December 2020 9 Figure 5 Macroinvertebrate index

Irrigation Water Monitoring Annual Report 2020 2021

required to enter three incidents in relation to irrigation consents over this period, which resulted in two infringement notices being issued. The overall rate of non-compliance across all exercised consents was 5%, which was similar to that seen during the 2019-2020 period (4%). During the 2020-2021 year, 84% of exercised irrigation consents in Taranaki achieved a high level of environmental performance and compliance with their consents, 11% achieved a good level of performance, while 5%

RKM Farms Ltd Piggery Annual Report 2021-2022

sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for