through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high,
the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the
page
70
Ngā āpitinga
Appendices
Appendix 1: Charging policies
Resource Management Act charging policySchedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of
the Resource Management Act 1991
SCHEDULE 1: SCALE OF CHARGES FOR STAFF TIME
Rate for processing resource consents
and responding to pollution incidents.
Rate for all other Council work.
Professional staff $111/hr $106/hr
Professional/supervisory staff $141/hr $132/hr
Team Leaders $173/hr $161/hr
by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the
utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and
its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and
councils provide kerbside landfill, glass and mixed
recycling services and separate glass collection. Over the
past five years, Stratford and South Taranaki household
waste disposal has remained static. Stratford has the
highest disposal rates per household for landfill waste
collected at kerbside, and will need to increase its recycling
rate of 20% to meet its 2023 target of 29%.
Composting and organic waste
After identifying that 43% of kerbside landfill was food
................................................................................................................................ 78
Document 2358500
page
page
1
Foreword
We are pleased to present the Taranaki Regional Council’s 2020/2021 Annual Plan, which has a firm focus on
stability in uncertain times while taking into account the challenges and opportunities that will continue to arise
from the COVID-19 pandemic.
We’re budgeting for no change in general rates (0% rather than 3.8% as originally proposed). With the disruption
caused by the
details of the performance and extent of compliance by CCCWSL, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with CCCWSL’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
for comparison with
. ... ... guideline values. In other words, how many sheds could be discharging odour at
.^ \ SA
i . ^' 5
. ^/^!
page
16
maximum rate at any one time. Dr Brady and Ms Barclay consider that the number
of sheds discharging at the higher rate is best determined using statistical techniques
based on empirical data. The other experts do not agree that there are sufficient
data to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn.
[51] Mr Chilton provided a