Fern Farms in relation to their Waitotara site 9
Table 2 Monthly average and maximum instantaneous groundwater abstraction rates 2018-2019 13
Table 3 Monthly average and maximum instantaneous spring water abstraction rates 2018-2019 14
Table 4 Chemical monitoring results for the irrigation pond 2018-2019 15
Table 5 Groundwater monitoring sites 16
Table 6 Water quality results for monitoring bores October 2018 to September 2019 17
Table 7 Chemical composition of Te Kiri o
requirement of the renewed
consent.
Stormwater from the site continued to be diverted to containment ponds, with the stormwater batch released
after quality checks. Sample results for the discharge samples collected by the Council were within those
prescribed by consent conditions.
Particulate deposition from air emissions was, in general, similar to the previous monitoring periods. At the
monitoring site west of the plant site the lactose deposition rate was found to be 7% over the guideline
but not be limited to (tick all that apply): AEE Page Number Section
☐ The rate of discharge and hydrological effects
☐ Ecosystem health and potential disturbance
☐ Indigenous biodiversity
☐ Hydrological functioning
page
01/23 - Doc # 3095941 Page 6 of 17
☐ Cultural values
☐ Amenity
☐ Source control
☐ Treatment
☐ Site sediment and
1.1.4
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance
Kapuni WTP sample results 27 June 2013 38
Table 4 Results of sampling at the Waimate West WTP 9 April 2013 38
Table 5 Results of sampling at the Inaha WTP 15 April 2013 39
Table 6 Compliance with abstraction rates at the Patea bores 47
Table 7 Compliance with consents 0634 and 3911 49
Table 8 Compliance with abstraction rates at the Waverley bores 50
Table 9 Summary of compliance in regards to abstraction rates,
volumes and data 55
Table 10 Summary of performance for
2.1 Site inspections 24
2.2 Non–exercised consents 26
2.3 Groundwater quality results 26
2.4 Residual flow compliance 27
2.5 Compliance with abstraction rate and volumetric limits 29
2.6 Record keeping compliance 30
2.7 Irrigation water usage 2013-2014 31
2.8 Investigations, interventions, and incidents 31
3. Discussion 34
3.1 Discussion of site performance 34
3.2 Evaluation of performance 35
3.3 Recommendations from the 2012-2013 Annual Report 38
3.4 Alterations to monitoring
13
1.3 Climatological data and irrigation requirements 14
1.3.1 Droughts in Taranaki 16
1.4 Monitoring programme 16
1.4.1 Introduction 16
1.4.2 Programme liaison and management 16
1.4.3 Site inspections 17
1.4.4 Measuring and reporting of water takes 17
2. Results 21
2.1 Site inspections 21
2.2 Non–exercised consents 21
2.3 Residual flow compliance 22
2.4 Compliance with abstraction rate and volumetric limits 25
2.5 Record keeping compliance 25
2.6 Groundwater quality
Rate
(FDR) analysis.
The results for the SEM nuisance periphyton programme during the 2016-2017 monitoring year showed
that on one occasion at one site there was a breach of the thick mat guideline and on five occasions across
four separate sites there was a breach of the long filaments guideline, out of a total of 64 site surveys. Ten
sites could not be surveyed in spring 2016 due to high water levels. For the 2017-2018 monitoring year
there were two occasions where there
from the
Stratford WTP’s backwash pond.
During the monitoring period SDC complied with all abstraction and discharge limits, and all abstraction
data was provided in timely manner. Toko water supply still has minor issues in regards to how abstraction
rates were measured, however a compliance plan was put in place to rectify this.
During the year, the SDC demonstrated a good level of environmental performance and a good level of
administrative performance.
For reference, in the
resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance and administrative compliance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the …