consents held by Silver Fern Farms Limited (Waitotara) List of tables Table 1 Monthly average and maximum instantaneous groundwater abstraction rates 2016-2017 13 Table 2 Monthly average and maximum instantaneous spring water abstraction rates 2016-2017 14 Table 3 Chemical monitoring results for the irrigation pond 2016-2017 15 Table 4 Groundwater monitoring sites 16 Table 5 Water quality results for monitoring bores October 2016 to September 2017 17 Table 6 Chemical
consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to SDC environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the consent holder approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as
1.1.4 Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance
Kapuni WTP sample results 27 June 2013 38 Table 4 Results of sampling at the Waimate West WTP 9 April 2013 38 Table 5 Results of sampling at the Inaha WTP 15 April 2013 39 Table 6 Compliance with abstraction rates at the Patea bores 47 Table 7 Compliance with consents 0634 and 3911 49 Table 8 Compliance with abstraction rates at the Waverley bores 50 Table 9 Summary of compliance in regards to abstraction rates, volumes and data 55 Table 10 Summary of performance for
2.1 Site inspections 24 2.2 Non–exercised consents 26 2.3 Groundwater quality results 26 2.4 Residual flow compliance 27 2.5 Compliance with abstraction rate and volumetric limits 29 2.6 Record keeping compliance 30 2.7 Irrigation water usage 2013-2014 31 2.8 Investigations, interventions, and incidents 31 3. Discussion 34 3.1 Discussion of site performance 34 3.2 Evaluation of performance 35 3.3 Recommendations from the 2012-2013 Annual Report 38 3.4 Alterations to monitoring
describes how the council is to deliver the outcomes agreed to by the local community, the level of rates expected for the first three years of the LTP and other information pertinent to the community. One aspect of a LTP is to set out public transport activities and funding sources for the next ten years Taranaki 2050 Roadmap In August 2019, Taranaki launched a co-designed Roadmap for how the region will transition to a low-emissions economy by 2050. A collaborative process has
13 1.3 Climatological data and irrigation requirements 14 1.3.1 Droughts in Taranaki 16 1.4 Monitoring programme 16 1.4.1 Introduction 16 1.4.2 Programme liaison and management 16 1.4.3 Site inspections 17 1.4.4 Measuring and reporting of water takes 17 2. Results 21 2.1 Site inspections 21 2.2 Non–exercised consents 21 2.3 Residual flow compliance 22 2.4 Compliance with abstraction rate and volumetric limits 25 2.5 Record keeping compliance 25 2.6 Groundwater quality
The $20m 'shovel-ready' grant to the Yarrow Stadium repair and refurbishment project is great news for the region and its ratepayers, who can expect a reduction of just over 40% in their Yarrow Stadium rates from July 2021. Works were put on hold during the lockdown while we conducted a thorough review of the project in the light of changing circumstances. The review gave us a clearer understanding of the stadium's prospects. Work on the project began ramping up again shortly after the
through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance
Rate (FDR) analysis. The results for the SEM nuisance periphyton programme during the 2016-2017 monitoring year showed that on one occasion at one site there was a breach of the thick mat guideline and on five occasions across four separate sites there was a breach of the long filaments guideline, out of a total of 64 site surveys. Ten sites could not be surveyed in spring 2016 due to high water levels. For the 2017-2018 monitoring year there were two occasions where there