critical infrastructure using the methodology
described in Section 1.4, rating assets as nationally, regionally and locally significant.
As a minimum, the data provided included spatial (locational information), asset type and a criticality
rating. At the first project workshop, the criticality assessment process was discussed so that a
reasonably consistent approach was taken across the lifelines sector.
2. Collection of regional hazard information
The most accurate and
wastewater records
indicated that discharges to the Kahouri Stream did not meet the 1:100 dilution factor. For the latter two
incidents the Company has been sent a 14 day letter requesting an explanation for the breaches, and further
page
enforcement action may follow. As a result of the issues, the Company’s environmental performance rating
for the year under review has been downgraded.
During the year, the Company demonstrated a level of environmental and administrative
ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good,
CDEM Joint Committee Agenda 19 May 2022
below (less than 10% of) the national environmental standards for air
quality (AQNES) (50 μg/m3). The air downwind of the flare would be rated according to MfE
criteria as ‘excellent’ in respect of the PM10 concentration.
Dioxins/furans: emissions of dioxins and furans expressed as toxic equivalents could not be
distinguished from zero (i.e there was no meaningful difference between the combustion
zone result and the laboratory blank result, at the limits of detection of mass quantities used
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.3 Map Co-ordinates at point of take (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM):
________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
Effluent management aside, Options one and two are similar in expecting water ways fenced and
riparian margins managed with timeframes to have this work completed before a regulatory regime
is implemented for those yet to meet the deadlines. The major difference between these two
policies is implementing land based effluent irrigation in all but exceptional circumstances.
In relation to the first two policy options, this report finds that:
• If the rate of fencing experienced in the
low impact recreation use
The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge
Very high
Overall Rating
Outstanding
annotation https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7 https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7
page
1
4
6
C
O
A
S
T
A
L
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
T
A
R
The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge
Very high
Overall Rating
Outstanding
page
1
2
4
C
O
A
S
T
A
L
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
T
A
R
A
N
A
K
I
S
c
h
e
d
u
le
2
–
C
o
a
s
t
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
o
u
t
s
t
a
n
d
in
g
v
a
lu
e
Parininihi.
page
125
CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I
The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge
Very high
Overall Rating
Outstanding
page
1
2
4
C
O
A
S
T
A
L
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
T
A
R
A
N
A
K
I
S
c
h
e
d
u
le
2
–
C
o
a
s
t
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
o
u
t
s
t
a
n
d
in
g
v
a
lu
e
Parininihi.
page
125
CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I