Gardens, also enjoyed greater patronage during the
year, with their gardens and facilities being continually refined
and enhanced.
The bottom line
The Council finished the 2017/2018 year with a surplus of
$962,000 (total comprehensive income). Total expenditure was
$26.6m. Overall it was a good result, noting that the general
rates increases have been at or below the rate of inflation for
the past few years (a 1% general rates increase in 2017/2018).
The Council's
page
Project Risk/Opportunity Management
Description Effect Mitigation Strategy
Risk Rating
(unmitigated)
Actions currently being taken
Lack of a clear strategy
and timeline for
engagement on key
strategic issues.
Engagement in this sense is
the two way discussions
needed to obtain external
stakeholder input on key FW
programme and FW Plan
elements.
Engagement requirements
for FW are significantly
higher than previous TRC
stormwater discharges from the northern and
southern stormwater outfalls, Inhalable Grade Lactose (IGL) plant, and stormwater detention ponds, and
infringement notice was issued in relation to the breach of the consent.
Particulate deposition from air emissions was, in general, similar to the previous monitoring periods. At the
monitoring site east of the southern stormwater pond the lactose deposition rate was found to be 20% over
the guideline value. No complaints were received and visual
may be required to neutralise this risk. The specific
measures required will depend on the circumstances.
page
- 5 -
3 Methods
A questionnaire was developed to elicit people’s involvement with reducing rat numbers,
and their involvement with, and attitude towards trapping rats. Involvement was measured
using a condensed version of the Laurent and Kapferer (1985) involvement scale
developed by Kaine (2019) with respondents rating two statements on
must satisfy.
The Council’s monitoring during the year under review included 21 inspections, two
deposition gauge surveys, and review of two stack test reports.
The deposition gauge surveys found that, in relation to dust resulting in deposited
particulates, ambient air quality in the area during the year under review was very good.
During the 2014-2015 year 13 % of the “TRC SEM” samples1 analysed exceeded the 4g/m2/30
days deposition rate guideline, with only 24% of all the gauges
the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance 1.1.4
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Trust, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned
day running of the site was generally of a
good standard. There were processes in place to minimise the contamination of stormwater and to
minimise the generation of wastewater, but this could be further improved. The discharge of wastewater
into the Kahouri Stream did not cause any recorded impact on the macroinvertebrate communities of this
stream, and the impact on water quality was minimal. However, discharge rates to the Kahouri Stream need
to be reduced to ensure a 1:100 dilution. The
responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Consent holder’s environmental and administrative performance
during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on
Evaluation of environmental and consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the
discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s
during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and
administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative compliance is concerned with the Company’s approach
to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations