sand at the pit bases (approximately 4-5 m below surface). Average annual rainfall for the site is 1,023 mm (taken from the nearby ‘Duffy’ monitoring station). As with the other South Taranaki coastal sites, this site is subject to strong winds. Site data Location Word descriptor: Manawapou Road, Manutahi, Taranaki Map reference: E 1717244 (NZTM) N 5608736 Mean annual rainfall: 1,023 mm Mean annual soil temperature: ~15.1°C Mean annual soil
Daily, average concentrations of fats in wastewater discharge, based on 24 hour flow- proportioned composite samples 33 Figure 8 Daily, average COD in wastewater discharge, based on 24 hour flow-proportioned composite samples 33 Figure 9 Map of sampling sites in relation to the outfall 37 Figure 10 Mean number of species per quadrat for spring surveys (1992-2017) 38 Figure 11 Mean Shannon-Weiner indices per quadrat for spring surveys (1992-2017) 38 Figure 12 Mean number of
the map in Figure 2. Table 2 Monitoring site details Sample source Site Site code Site Description Discharge to Kahouri Stream D1 IND003002 Wastewater discharge pumped to Kahouri Stream Irrigated wastewater I1 IND004008 Wastewater irrigated to land Kahouri Stream K1 KHI000295 Upstream property boundary K2 KHI000300 Downstream property boundary and approx. 90 m downstream of wastewater discharge (SH3) K3 KHI000305 65 m downstream of KHI000300 Unnamed tributary
activity and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the location of the activity, and an outline of the matters covered by the company’s air discharge permit. Subsection 2 presents the results of monitoring of the companies activities during the period under review, including scientific and technical data. Subsection 3 discusses the results, their interpretation, and their significance for the environment in the immediate vicinity of the site under discussion.
for the period under review. Each company’s activity is then discussed in a separate section (Sections 2 to 7). In the subsections for each company (e.g. Section 2.1) there is a general description of the industrial activity and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the location of the activity, and an outline of the matters covered by the company’s air discharge permit. Subsection 2 presents the results of monitoring of the company’s activities during the period
of the monitoring programme in place for the period under review. Each company’s activity is then discussed in a separate section (Sections 2 to 6). In the subsections for each company (e.g. Section 2.1) there is a general description of the industrial activity and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the location of the activity, and an outline of the matters covered by the company’s air discharge permit. Subsection 2 presents the results of monitoring of the
water monitoring. The removal of hydrocarbon related products reduces risk in these areas significantly. The odour issue is well understood and with correct operational techniques applied can be well controlled. _________________ David Gibson 9 March 2021 page Appendix 1-One Billion Tree Programme-Funding Agreement Map BEFORE THE TARANAKI REGIONAL COUNCIL STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF DAVID PAUL GIBSON DATED 9 March 2021
Taranaki By Products Air and Water Annual Report 2021-2022
List of figures Figure 1 Influent phosphorus and mean concentration over 180 days 10 Figure 2 Effluent nitrate 11 Figure 3 Aerial location map of sampling sites in relation to Stratford WWTP 13 Figure 4 Taxa number, MCI scores and SQMCI scores for biomonitoring sites in the Patea River (spring) 16 Figure 5 Taxa number, MCI scores and SQMCI scores for biomonitoring sites in the Patea River (summer) 17 page iii Figure 6 Periphyton sampling sites in the Patea
rivers, lakes or the coast. From the Stratford District, 74% of respondents had visited one of these sites in the last year. Figure 2 represents the most popular coastal, river or lake destinations for residents from the New Plymouth, Stratford and South Taranaki Districts. The top ten most frequently visited sites for residents from each district have been represented on these maps with dots representing the percentage of respondents who listed that specific location. Some respondents listed