scale and can be interpreted as applying to a section of
river segments in an FMU, rather than a specific monitoring site.
FMU-based baseline states (expressed as percentages of stream lengths) for the macroinvertebrate numeric
attribute states are shown in Table 6. Maps of stream widths under each NOF band for all three numeric
attribute states are in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.
Table 6: FMU-based baseline states for the macroinvertebrate numeric attribute states (MCI,
held by the companies in the Lower Waiwhakaiho area;
• the nature of the monitoring programme in place for the period under review; and
• a description of the activities and operations conducted in the Companies’ site/catchment.
Each company’s activity is then discussed in a separate section (Sections 2 to 7).
In the subsections for each company (e.g. Section 2.1) there is a general description of the industrial activity
and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the
FMU-based baseline states (expressed as percentages of stream lengths) for the macroinvertebrate numeric
attribute states are shown in Table 6. Maps of stream widths under each NOF band for all three numeric
attribute states are in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.
Table 6: FMU-based baseline states for the macroinvertebrate numeric attribute states (MCI, QMCI, ASPM) expressed as percentage
waterway length in each FMU within each NOF attribute band.
NOF Band
No.
sites
MCI
REGIONAL XPLORER
STDC, SDC and TRC collaborate to
provide regional geographic
information system (GIS) services
to the community via Taranaki
Regional Xplorer.
Regional Xplorer is a free web-
based mapping and local authority
information service. Users have
page
18
access to property information, infrastructure services, environmental services, planning
information and aerial photgraphy.
Benefits
Cost-savings from creating and maintaining a single system.
located around the edge of Beatrix Bay. Backbones (surface structures) on
the 37 marine farms span approximately 8.5 km (33%) of total shoreline
length at sea level (but more under water). Approximately 85% of the surface
area (2,000 ha) of Beatrix Bay is not occupied by mussel farms.
[10] At the hearing, a map was produced showing Beatrix Bay and
the King Shag foraging in detail. It illustrates the necklace arrangement of
the granted marine farms, together with the dates of the grant of those
stormwater discharge consent 5349-1 46
Table 10 Summary of performance for dam and diversion consent 5350-1 47
Table 11 Summary of performance for structures consent 5351-1 48
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map of Taranaki showing the location of the Central landfill site 3
Figure 2 Aerial view of the Central landfill site and sampling points, up to June 2017 12
Figure 3 Increased Central landfill monitoring network, July 2017 onward 13
Figure 4 Central landfill surface
Figure 4 Location of sampling sites in relation to the Eltham
wastewater treatment system 20
page
iv
Figure 5 Aerial location map 21
Figure 6 Trend in MCI at the Mangawhero Stream site downstream
of the outfall (MWH000490) 28
Figure 7 Trend in MCI at the Mangawhero Stream site upstream of
the outfall (MWH000380) 28
List of photos
Photo 1 Overflow retention pond, 21 July 2011 8
Photo 2 Replacement aerator, June 2013 14
page
1
TRC Guidelines for the Control of Drilling Wastes 50
Appendix IV Schrider Landfarm Results 545
Appendix V Maps of Landfarmed Sites 58
Appendix VI Spence Road Landfarm results 60
Appendix VII Agknowledge landfarm review report 63
page
iii
List of tables
Table 1 Summary of landfarming consents covered by this report 5
Table 2 Soil samples taken on 12 June 2013 at Geary Landfarm 12
Table 3 Origin supplied soil results from the Geary
consent 43
4. Recommendations 44
Glossary of common terms and abbreviations 45
Bibliography and references 47
Appendix I Resource consents held by Trustpower Ltd in relation to the Patea HEPS 1
Appendix II Lake Rotorangi Hazard Maps 1
page
ii
List of tables
Table 1 Summary of breaches of flow rise and recession rates in the 2011-2014
period 17
Table 2 Summary of lake levels in relation to consent conditions 20
Table 3 Reports submitted to
site activity .................................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Site map .................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2 Description of the site activity ................................................................................................................ 8
3.3 Composting operation