move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance and administrative compliance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s
during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and
administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment
move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
page
3
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance and administrative compliance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s
during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and
administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on
further dust
controls were required at the site. At approximately 1.18pm the first water truck
arrived, however the rate of application was insufficient to reduce the dust discharge
from the site. A second water truck arrived at 3.30pm. Dust discharge from the site
began reducing upon the application of water to the exposed surfaces from both water
trucks. 1,500 litres of Stabil-X was added to the water trucks. The application of
7 Affidavit of Daniel Charles Hunte
Council on
performance of scheme in all floods exceeding 2,500
cumecs at Bertrand Rd.
Funding
Maintenance funded by: Targeted rate over the New
Plymouth District
Damage repairs funded by: Rates (as above)
Financial reserves
Reprioritising works
Loan
Financial reserves
Aim to: - Build up reserves to meet above average planned
expenditure.
- Draw down reserves to meet unexpected
expenditure.
Review of plan Review when there is a change in
Council on
performance of scheme in all floods exceeding 2,500
cumecs at Bertrand Rd.
Funding
Maintenance funded by: Targeted rate over the New
Plymouth District
Damage repairs funded by: Rates (as above)
Financial reserves
Reprioritising works
Loan
Financial reserves
Aim to: - Build up reserves to meet above average planned
expenditure.
- Draw down reserves to meet unexpected
expenditure.
Review of plan Review when there is a change in
number (refer
to land title or rates notice)
5.3 Map reference/s NZTM Co-ordinates at
point of activity
E N
5.4 Closest Waterbody
Provide the name of the closest
river or stream to the activity
page
01/23 - Doc # 3096580 Page 4 of 10
5.5 If the owner and/or occupier of the activity site differ from the applicant please provide their name and contact
details Please note that written approval is
TDF is not operational during maintenance or breakdown;
the sludge volume exceeds the operational capacity of the TDF; and
the TDF is being upgraded.
8. The land proposed for the discharge in this application was approximately 4.2 ha. The
application states that it would therefore likely provide sufficient capacity for disposal
of 10,000 wet tonnes of sludge. However, recognising the maximum proposed
discharge rate of 2000 tonnes/ha, and taking account of buffer distances, NPDC
Taranaki during the
year involving a lessee and a stevedoring company. One of which involved a minor hydraulic oil spill, and
the other involved a minor molasses spill. Neither incident resulted in adverse environmental effects nor
further enforcement action.
During the year, Downer, Technix, Liquigas and Methanex obtained a high rating for environmental and
high rating for administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents. Port Taranaki’s
environmental performance and
consents for Urenui Beach Camp (2046-3) and Onaero Bay Holiday Park (1389-3) that requires
improvement. This rating was influenced by the ongoing exceedances of discharge volume limits from both
camps. No adverse effects have been identified in relation to these discharges and NPDC are being pro-
active in their efforts to resolve the issues. NPDC demonstrated a high level of administrative performance
with resource consents over the same period.
For reference, in the 2020-2021 year, consent
the non compliances identified related to the non-submission of injection data and
supporting information during the previous 2009 -2012 monitoring period. This non-
compliance resulted in the Company’s compliance rating being downgraded for 2009-2012
page
period. This non-compliance has therefore not been taken into account when assessing the
Company’s compliance rating for the period under review.
A second unauthorised incident was registered when the Council became