Your search for 'rates' returned 2163 results.

Appendix Y - assessment of odour effect

(L). This type of assessment is similar to the guideline for assessing odour in the RAQP. The FIDOL factors are explained in greater detail below: • Frequency; relates to how often an individual is exposed to odour. Factors determining this include the frequency that the source releases odour (including its source type, characteristics and the rate of emission of the compound or compounds); prevailing meteorological conditions; and topography. • Intensity: is the perceived

Annual report 2015-2016

of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to

Annual Report 2016-2017

the region’s resources. 1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance

Annual report 2015-2016

development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative

Annual report 2013-2014

holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and

Annual report 2014-2015

of compliance by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to Origin Energy’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with Origin Energy’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of

Combined biennial report 2013-2015

during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating of each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative compliance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans

Taranaki seismicity 2009-2010 - GNS Science

distribution....................................................................................... 5 6.1.3 Long-term rate .................................................................................................. 5 6.2 Volcanic significance ..................................................................................................... 5 6.3 Network effectiveness ................................................................................................... 5 7.0 CONCLUSIONS

Taranaki seismicity 2010-2011 - GNS Science

............................................................................................................. 4 6.1 Long-term data .............................................................................................................. 4 6.1.1 Larger earthquakes .......................................................................................... 4 6.1.2 Long-term distribution ....................................................................................... 4 6.1.3 Long-term rate ..................................................................................................