Your search for 'rates' returned 2314 results.

Image 1795 Opunake Power ltd 15 March 2022

amenity values of Opunake Lake. 2. The rate of taking shall not exceed 3,900 litres per second. 3. The consent holder shall notify the Council within three working days of water first being taken for the purpose of electricity generation. For clarity, where the conditions of this consent refer to the date that consent is first exercised that date shall be the date that water is first taken for the purpose of electricity generation. 4. The consent holder shall measure and record the

Hāwera oxidation ponds monitoring 2019-2020

report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and …

Lower Waitara River Flood Control Scheme Asset Management Plan 2017

Council on performance of scheme in all floods exceeding 2,500 cumecs at Bertrand Rd. Funding Maintenance funded by: Targeted rate over the New Plymouth District Damage repairs funded by: Rates (as above) Financial reserves Reprioritising works Loan Financial reserves Aim to: - Build up reserves to meet above average planned expenditure. - Draw down reserves to meet unexpected expenditure. Review of plan Review when there is a change in

Lower Waitara River Flood Control Scheme Asset Management Plan

Council on performance of scheme in all floods exceeding 2,500 cumecs at Bertrand Rd. Funding Maintenance funded by: Targeted rate over the New Plymouth District Damage repairs funded by: Rates (as above) Financial reserves Reprioritising works Loan Financial reserves Aim to: - Build up reserves to meet above average planned expenditure. - Draw down reserves to meet unexpected expenditure. Review of plan Review when there is a change in

Kaupapa Māori Freshwater Assessments

abundance estimates, to size class distributions, habitat requirements and use, range and distribution, and data on growth rates and species health. This data often helps to quantify iwi and hapū kōrero21 and observations about decline in species abundance, distribution

At a glance

wetland area between 2007 and 2012 but— the annual rate of wetland area loss has reduced by 60%. $1.2million The Council has increased its biodiversity budget to 178 sites covering 119,103 hectares are classed as Key Native Ecosystems. . 4,374 properties in the Self-help Possum Control Programme— the largest participation in NZ. 151,054Taranaki has hectares More than 90% approval rating for living environment, parks and reserves and

Form 120: Discharge to air (including Coastal Marine Area)

_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.4 Map Co-ordinates at point of discharge (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)

Form 112: Discharge stormwater and sediment from earthworks to water or land

Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice) _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.6 Assessment/Valuation number of property

Taranaki seismicity 2009-2010 - GNS Science

distribution....................................................................................... 5 6.1.3 Long-term rate .................................................................................................. 5 6.2 Volcanic significance ..................................................................................................... 5 6.3 Network effectiveness ................................................................................................... 5 7.0 CONCLUSIONS

Taranaki seismicity 2010-2011 - GNS Science

............................................................................................................. 4 6.1 Long-term data .............................................................................................................. 4 6.1.1 Larger earthquakes .......................................................................................... 4 6.1.2 Long-term distribution ....................................................................................... 4 6.1.3 Long-term rate ..................................................................................................