Commentary/Highlights
The Council is implementing 209 specific individual compliance programmes in 2015/2016 for major consent holders (including
catchment programmes that cover multiple consent holders within a single programme), together with programmes for
hydrocarbon exploration and development activities as they arise. Consent holders are assessed on environmental performance
and on consent compliance. The ratings for these consent holders in 2014/2015 was found to be 75% ‘high’ and 22%
209 specific individual compliance programmes in 2015/2016 for major consent holders (including
catchment programmes that cover multiple consent holders within a single programme), together with programmes for
hydrocarbon exploration and development activities as they arise. Consent holders are assessed on environmental performance
and on consent compliance. The rates for these consent holders in 2014/2015 was found to be 75% ‘high’ and 22% ‘good’. The
farm dairy effluent
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving
sustainable development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving
floating
platforms was practicable and materially different from imagining ‘a no scheme’ environment. The
Ngāti Rangi decision observed that not following Port Gore when assessing the effects of a
proposal in the context of that case would be to “lock in” hydro-electricity water takes and flow rates
for as long as the controlled activity status was retained, thereby preventing adverse effects from
being avoided or mitigated.10 In support of its finding, the Court highlighted the
assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data)
refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned
performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the
timely
rate of abstraction shall not exceed 1.5l/s;
The bore shall be located not less than 500m from the sea or
adjacent bores;
The well shall be located not less than 25m from the sea or
adjacent wells or surface water bodies;
The well or bore shall be located not less than 50m from any
effluent treatment pond, septic tank, silage stack or pit.
Permitted
Taking and use of groundwater (continued)
Activity Rule Standards/Terms/Conditions Classification
of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by WRS, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with WRS’s approach to
demonstrating
Council to continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental