Location of activity (Including: Street/road name, number, and locality): _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.3. Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice): _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.4. Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to
works (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) page 06/22 - #517355 Page 4 of 18 3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice) _________________________________________________________________________________
3.4 Legal description of property at location of works (refer to land title or rates notice) _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Riparian Management 3.6
very little discussion of the effects of total allocation. The allocation in any consents is usually for the maximum take and the sum of maximum takes for all consents is the total allocation. In practice, most consent holders only abstract at a maximum rate for a short period of time. For example, irrigation takes only take water in the summer and only at peak rates when it is necessary. Actual takes are usually about 50% of the total allocation (MfE 2015). Total allocation, as
Agenda for Taranaki Regional Transport Committee 2 December 2015
enables the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for
of environmental and administrative performance 1.1.4 Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the
2018-2019 regional NOx study were also presented in this report. The associated analysis indicated that the neighbouring Kapuni Production station was rated in the ‘good’ category (National Environmental Standards) for 1 hour averages. These results, and all regional monitoring to date, have shown that Taranaki has very clean air, and on a regional basis there are no significant pressures upon the quality of the air resource. Further, site specific ambient air quality monitoring is proposed
species, often leading to a reduction in biodiversity. Julian's Pond, south-east of Opunake has a range of indigenous species, including nationally threatened plants. page 1456683MB- Final Draft 163 Biodiversity Wetland areas in the region prior to human settlement (left) compared to those mapped in 2012 (right). ‘A 60% reduction in the annual rate of loss to wetland area.’ Wetland extent Since the time of human settlement of New Zealand, much of the region’s original
and New Zealand Oil Services Ltd. Water samples were collected for physicochemical analysis on selected inspections. Consent data was also supplied to the Council for review. During the year, Port Taranaki Ltd, Downer New Zealand Ltd, and Technix Taranaki Terminal Ltd obtained a good rating for environmental and high rating for administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents. There was one non-compliant discharge recorded during the year, however, the cause for the