483.15 524.91 235.67 452.45 504.50 376.83 394.60 336.28 452.48 452.48 5,571.98 1,503.83 1,974.83 1,955.88 1,932.59 2,099.63 819.64 1,537.16 2,017.99 1,507.31 1,578.41 1,345.13 1,809.92 1,809.92 21,892.24 Sensibility test Irrigation volume/yr 17,422 - Pumping rate M 3 /hr 30 Week 1
Reference Production Land or on Forested Land regulated by the NES-PF. d) Payment of administrative charges e) Imposition of limits on or relating to discharge or ambient concentrations of contaminants, or on or relating to mass discharge rates f) Best practicable option to prevent or minimise adverse effects beyond the boundary g) Payment of financial contributions Note: Appendix IX contains information on good management practices to prevent or minimise the
J Mack (Administrator Manager) Miss L Davidson (Committee Administrator) Apologies An apology from Councillor D L Lean for lateness was received and sustained. Notification of Annual Plan and rates to be discussed under general business. Late Items page 1. Confirmation of Minutes – 25 February 2020 Resolves That the Taranaki Regional Council: takes as read and confirms the minutes and resolutions of the Ordinary Meeting …
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
Under the NPS-FM, water use is managed by setting environmental flows and levels, taking into account any changes that are likely to occur as a result of climate change. Limits can then be set on the rate and amount of water taken, and where and when that water can be abstracted. Monitoring of water use ensures that people comply with the relevant rules and regulations. The Council’s current Regional Freshwater Plan requires that 66% of the mean annual low flow (MALF) be retained as
through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned …
to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their
utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities
extent of compliance by NPDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to
and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with NPDC’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to